A federal court rejected Richard Prince’s claim that his use of another artist’s work was so innovative, he shouldn’t have to go to trial for infringement.
Source: Richard Prince’s Loss Over Appropriated Art Gives Copyright Law Hope
Samples and Grading Criteria
Case Studies
ACU Links
Broadcasting
Copyright
Courts and Case Law
Federal Agencies
Legal Organizations
- Americans United for Separation of Church and State
- Freedom of Information Foundation of Texas
- Illinois First Amendment Center
- Institute for Justice
- Netlitigation
- Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
- Society of Professional Journalists
- Student Press Law Center
- The Five Freedoms Timeline
- The Free Expression Policy Project
- The Freedom Forum
Private Law Firms
Religion
Federal Statutes
- 15 U.S. Code, Chapter 22 – Trademarks
- 17 U.S. Code, Chapter 1 – Subject Matter and Scope of Copyright
- 18 U.S. Code § 1466A - Obscene visual representations of the sexual abuse of children
- 18 U.S. Code § 2252 - Certain activities relating to material involving the sexual exploitation of minors
- 18 U.S. Code § 2252A - Certain activities relating to material constituting or containing child pornography
- 18 U.S. Code § 2256 - Definitions for chapter
State Statutes
Abilene City Ordinances
Login
Richard Prince’s Loss Over Appropriated Art Gives Copyright Law Hope
by Kenneth Pybus | 08.14.17 | Copyright and Trademark