Curriculum Vitae

 

April 2013

Personal                                                                                                                        Steven J. Brice                                                                                                                   McKinzie Hall                                                                                                                       122 McGlothlin Campus Center                                                                                               ACU BOX 28147                                                                                                           Abilene, Texas 79699

Age: 24

Wife: Regina

 

Education

 

Abilene Christian University (M.Div)                                                                        2014 Major Areas: Missions

Amberton University (M.S)                                                                                         2013 Major: Christian Counseling

Southwestern Christian Counseling (B.S)                                                                 2010 Major: Religious Studies

 

Ministry Experience

 

Youth Minister, Cedar Crest Church of Christ, Dallas, Texas                           2008-2010

Ministerial Intern, Crenshaw Church of Christ, Los Angeles, California            2010-2010

Ministerial Intern, Cedar Hill Church of Christ, Cedar Hill, Texas                       2010-2011

 

Awards and Honors

SwCC National Dinner Day Scholarship Recipient (Fall 2006-2008)

Freshmen Class Chaplin (2006-2007)

Circle K (Kiwansis) International member (2006-2008)

Southwestern Christian College Chorus member (2006-2008)

SouthwesternChristianCollegeChorus Chaplin (2007-2009)

Three time recipient of the J.S Winston Sound Doctrine Scholarship (2007-2010)

Two time recipient of the Walter Woodard Memorial Scholarship (2008 & 2009)

Two time recipient of the Melvin Lee Chappell Memorial Scholarship (2008 & 2009)

TAU PHI KAPPA Ministerial Fraternity (2009-Present)

Carroll Pitts Jr. Ministerial Scholarship Recipient (2009)

Anna Murphy Scholarship Recipient (2009)

Two time C.C. Locke Scholarship Recipient (2009 & 2010)

Two time Student Support Service Scholarship Recipient (2009 & 2010)

 

 

 

Pathways Project #1 (Junior Year)

Philippians: What is the Occasion?

 

By: Steven Brice

 

 

 

 

 

BIBL 620 Advanced Introduction to the New Testament

Professor James Thompson

April 23rd, 2012

Philippians: What is the Occasion?

The book of Philippians distinguishes itself within the biblical canon as a letter that is abundant with positives.  This document overflows with joy, encouragement, and empowerment.  Throughout this letter, the writer reveals traits of friendship, love, and appreciation toward his intended readers.  In fact, the letter begins with a common salutation (Philippians 1:1-2) and makes a transition to a segment of appreciation and joy for the partnership experienced in the gospel.  The writer writes “I thank my God every time I remember you, constantly praying with joy in every one of my prayers for all of you, because of your sharing in the gospel from the first day until now”[1] These verses give an indication that a mutual friendship exists between the two parties. Mary Getty adds to this perspective by stating, “These verses are rich in the beautiful thoughts typical of Philippians.  Thanksgiving, joy, solidarity of community in the gospel: these are ideas that reverberate throughout the epistle. Paul’s friends in Philippi give him cause for thanks.”[2] The opening of this letter sets the pace for the joy, encouragement, and empowerment that the author will continue to unpack throughout the letter.

It is the intention of this document to explore and add to the conversation of the purpose/occasion for the letter written to the Philippians and will explore a case study of the North side Church of Christ, making some critical analysis as well as make potential and relevant application.  In an attempt to discover the occasion of this letter, this document will explore the historical context, literary function, and the theological implications. This will lead to a concise awareness of the purpose to the letter to the Philippians. Paul in addition to expressing thanksgiving for the Philippians acts of friendship towards him, desired to exhort the Philippians to unity.

The Historical Context

The Authorship

The letter to the Philippians begins with a common salutation, “Paul and Timothy, servants of Christ Jesus.”[3] Paul is the undisputed author of this letter. Scholars have rarely challenged the concept of Paul’s association with this.  The few that have challenged the belief question Paul’s full authorship for this letter. C.J. Bahr in his attempt to prove that Paul had a secretary to write parts of his letter to the Philippians declares “While Philippians has no specific statement about the hand of Paul, it will now be safe to assume that, as usual, he did write a part of the letter in his own hand.”[4] The letter however contains several personal pronouns that give some reasonable implications that there is a mono writer. No statements within the letter allow doubt that Paul wrote this.

The letter contains a considerable amount of evidence that permits little room for one to doubt the authorship of Paul.  In chapter one, as Paul begins the letter, he expresses an appreciation for their partnership in the gospel of Christ (verses 5-11), and he provides them an update on his present circumstances.  He informs them that his imprisonment has been beneficial in his attempts to spread the gospel.  He writes “I want you to know, beloved, that what has happened to me has actually helped to spread the gospel, so that it has become known throughout the whole imperial guard and to everyone else that my imprisonment is for Christ.”[5]  He speaks of his friends and co-workers (2:19-29).  Paul gives an autobiography in chapter 3:1-6 and he acknowledges the gift that the Philippians gave him in chapter 4:10-20.

The letter to the Philippians uses language and style identical to other letters strongly ascribed to Paul.  Paul’s mention of false teachers replicates his other writings where he discusses false teachers that were either in the midst or approaching God’s people. Ralph Martin concurs by stating the “Phrases, ideas, and allusions to opposition of false teachers that show up here also appear in letters unquestionably written by Paul (Romans, 1 and 2 Corinthians, Galatians).”[6]

Date & Place of Writing

Within the text, Paul clearly mentions that he is current imprisoned for Christ and while imprisoned, the gospel has become known throughout the entire imperial guard or praetorium.  He writes, “…what has happened to me has actually helped to spread the gospel, so that it has become known throughout the whole imperial guard and to everyone else that my imprisonment is for Christ.”[7] It is safe to conclude that Paul is in prison for the sake of the gospel.  Among scholars today there are discussions concerning whether Paul was writing from Rome, Caesarea, or Ephesus.

The date and place of the letter to the Philippians is a contested issue among many scholars.  There are several conclusions as to when and where Paul wrote the letter. In addition to the date and place, another topic of concern is if Paul wrote the letter to the Philippians in one setting.  Some scholars have contested that in chapter 3, where Paul speaks about false teachers and demonstrates that the readers need not consider the accolades of things done in the physical, gives a different style to the entire letter. Some scholars opine that the language and style of chapter 3 is completely different than the remainder of the letter. An on-going discussion between those who embrace the single-letter theory is currently talking place within the field. “Those who argue that Philippians consists of multiple letters claim that this shift in Ton and Stimmung exposes a seam between two originally separate sources. Even those who maintain a single-letter theory recognize the difficulty of this transformation in textual timbre.”[8] The question of the composition of Paul’s letter influences when and where Paul wrote this letter.

Scholars who advocate for Paul’s writing from a Roman imprisonment argue that Paul was under house arrest and was able to receive visitation from friends.  The fact that Paul mentions the fact he was in the praetorium gives added evidence to the idea that he was in Rome.  Although praetorium existed in other places, traditionally scholars viewed that Rome was the more likely place for Paul because of his imprisonment.  This then leads to the idea that as Paul was writing to the Philippians he would not have seen his friends at Philippi because of the pending execution.  As Fitzgerald points outs, the major rebuttal for those who are not advocates of this theory would look at Rome as being a “great distance from Philippi (ca. 800 miles) and the consequent length of time necessary for the occurrence of the number of communications presupposed.…”[9] Due to the distance and lack of reliable transportation, it would be very challenging for Paul to receive and send messages to the Philippians.

Scholars who are proponents for Paul writing from Caesarea believes that the Paul description of his situation coexist more cohesively with the Luke’s account of Paul’s imprisonment in Acts. Luke says “When they came to Caesarea and delivered the letter to the governor, they presented Paul also before him.”[10] In addition, Paul had a centurion to keep him in custody but still had the opportunity to receive visitors.[11] This appears to link perfectly especially since Paul is expressing thanksgiving within his letter to the Philippians for sending him gifts.  In addition to the sending of the gifts, the Philippians also sent Epaphroditus, which reveals that Paul though imprisoned could receive visitors.  This correlates with the conditions of Paul’s imprisonment in Caesarea.  The theory, though, is also imperfect in a similar way as the proposed Rome imprisonment.  As one writer states, “the distance from Philippi (some nine hundred to one thousand miles by sea, and farther by land) also mitigates against the location.”[12]

Scholars who advocates for an Ephesus imprisonment propose that the distance between Ephesus and Philippi would promote frequent communication between Paul and the Philippians. In Acts, Luke records Timothy with Paul in Ephesus opposed to be with him in Rome or Caesarea.  This theory supports the notion that Paul was able to send Timothy to them and also share with the Philippians rapid updates concerning the welfare of Epaphroditus as he was sick while on his trip.[13]  The conjecture also alleviates the concern of Paul desiring to see the Philippians. This no longer would be an issue since an Ephesus imprisonment was an earlier account of his imprisonment than the account of Rome.  Although this theory appears to be a more feasible no account in Acts or any statement from Paul that gives evidence of an imprisonment in Ephesus.   Advocates for this theory consider the riot mentioned in Acts 19:23-41 as having some possible evidence of Paul being arrested and being put on trial.  However, no concrete evidence exists that Paul had an imprisonment for any length of time allowing the impression that Paul had time to be in communication with the Philippians.

Each theory of Paul’s imprisonment in Rome, Caesarea, or Ephesus while writing the letter to the Philippians has its strengths and weaknesses.  Although it is clear that the letter to the Philippians was written when Paul was in prison, there is not enough evidence to truly figure out which imprisonment Paul was in.  From the account of Acts itself, it appears to be impossible to discern which location Paul was in.

The Church in Philippi

In Acts 16, during Paul’s second missionary journey, Paul accompanied by Timothy and Silas received a vision of a man of Macedonia pleading with him to go over to Macedonia to help them.  Paul was convinced that God called them to proclaim the gospel to them.  Therefore Paul “and those who accompanied sailed to go to Macedonia.  They reached a city by the name of Philippi which was the leading city of the district of Macedonia and a Roman Colony.”[14]  They dwelled in Philippi for a couple of days and when it was the Sabbath day, they went outside the city to look for a place to pray.

The first converts to Christianity in Philippi were Lydia and her household.  Lydia was from the city of Thyatira and sold purple clothing.  These garments were expensive. Romans however, loved the color of royalty; therefore, to seal purple clothing in Philippi which was a Roman colony was good for business. Lydia therefore might have had financial means.  Lydia being a wealthy woman might also have had a big house for her to invite the missionaries to come and stay at her house. Also some evidence suggests that the church was established in her home.  One writer states “to handle such an expensive product Lydia must have been a woman of means. The account in Acts supports this conclusion, for it implies that she had a spacious mansion in Philippi, perhaps a typical Roman town-house of the better class, one that had ample room to accommodate several guests.”[15]

One day, while Paul and the missionaries were going to a place to pray, they met a slave-girl who had a spirit of divination.  This slave girl was good for business for her owners because she was a fortune-teller.  When the fortune-teller saw Paul and the missionaries, the bible says that she uttered these words “these men are slaves of the Most High God, who proclaim to you a way of salvation.”[16] This slave girl did this for several days until Paul became annoyed and rebuke the spirit to come out of her in the name of Jesus.  This caused the slave-girl owners to be furious with Paul and the missionaries.  Therefore, the owners seized Paul and Silas and dragged them into the market place before the officials.  The crowds joined in the riot and they beat Paul and Silas.  They threw Paul and Silas in prison where a jailer watched over them. During the time in prison, Paul and Silas began singing and praying, leading to the conversion of the jailer and his household.  The next morning, the city officials released Paul and Silas and asked them to leave the city.

Before departing, they went to Lydia’s home to see and encourage the brothers and sisters that were there.  Although distance kept Paul and the Philippians physically separated, Paul and the Philippians maintained their communication.  In Philippians 4:15-16, Paul mentions the fact that they were the only ones that supported him while he was in Thessalonica. When the Philippians heard of his imprisonment, they sent a gift with Epaphroditus, who was one of their members.  Epaphroditus became ill and nearly died.  As Paul writes in Philippians 2:25-30, Epaphroditus regained his health and planned to return to them. In addition, Paul planned to send Timothy and even hoped to visit them again.

Literary Form

The letter to the Philippians has a unique style of writing.  While the letter as similar language and style to his other letters. The entire letter appears to have has a tone that is different from Paul’s letter to the Corinthians, Galatians, and the Romans.  The tone is much milder and pleasant than any other letter Paul wrote within the biblical canon. Scholars have noted that some of the basis rhetoric style within this letter is friendship and the Christ hymn.

Letter of Friendship

From the beginning of the letter, there are traces of an intimate relationship between Paul and the Philippians.  Paul states “I thank my God in all my remembrance of you, always offering prayer with joy in my every prayer for you all, in view of your participation in the gospel from the first day until now.”[17] Here Paul states the fact that the Philippians collaborated and co-labored with him in the spreading of the good news of Christ.  In the same chapter, Paul gives them updates concerning his circumstances.  In addition, in chapter 4, Paul acknowledges the fact they were concerned about his condition.  As mentioned before, this letter has a different tone than any other letter Paul wrote within the biblical canon.  In discussing the uniqueness of this letter, one writer states

“Familial letters and letters of friendship often included reassurances and the writer’s well-being (1:12-26) and expressions of concern for the recipients (1:27-2:18). Paul uses the conventions of friendship not only as a way to reaffirm the relationship he shares with the Philippians, but because his imprisonment and the adversity the congregation faces represent real treats to the Philippians’ embodiment of the gospel.”[18]

Throughout the letter, Paul makes an ardent on unity.  In chapter 1, Paul encourages the Philippians to live life in such a way that it reflects the gospel of Christ.  After sharing with his friends an update on his life, and his feedback on those who preach the gospel with the wrong motives, Paul encourages his friends to be good faithful stewards of the gospel. He says “only, live your life in a manner worthy of the gospel of Christ, so that, whether I come and see you or am absent and hear about you, I will know that you are standing firm in one spirit, striving side by side with one mind for the faith of the gospel…”[19] From this impetus, Paul exhorts them to be of the same minds reminding them of the blessings they have in Christ Jesus which should lead them to humble themselves to one another.[20] Afterwards, Paul paints the perfect picture of the humility by focusing their attention on the humility of Christ. In chapter 4, Paul transitions from a general and broad approach and begins using a more personal approach to to exhort them towards unity.  Paul states, “I urge Euodia and I urge Syntyche to be of the same mind in the Lord. Yes, and I ask you also, my loyal companion, help these women, for they have struggles beside me the work of the gospel, together with Clement and the rest of my co-workers, whose names are in the book of life.”[21]

This is unique of Paul to mention these sisters after exhorting the entire readership chapter in 1 and 2 to be of the same mind. His personal exhortation to these sisters is relatively brief; however, their issue might have caused some disruption to the unity of the community of faith.  After Paul’s convincing explanation and appeal for the church to be of same mind in chapter 1 and 2 “the brevity of this argument can be attributed in part to the fact that Paul assumes that these women will have heard and learned from the earlier appeals for self-sacrificial behavior that produces unity.”[22] Paul emphasis on unity adds to the discussion on the traces of friendship within the letter. Both the broad and more personal urges reveal that Paul cherished unity and wanted his beloved friends to remember the importance of unity in Christ. Remembering the humility of Christ is the foundation of the unity of the Philippians.

The Christ Hymn

Philippians 2:6-11, traditionally referred to as the Christ Hymn exposes the foundation of unity, humility. Within this text, Paul paints a beautiful picture of humility and self-denial in the person of Jesus Christ.  The context of Paul’s hymn is his desire for his friends to remain united. He commands them to have the same mind in Christ Jesus.  Paul exhorts his friends to act in a way that shows genuine care for others, so much so that they should care for others more than they care for themselves.  Paul in exhorting them gives them to perfect example of humility for the benefit of others.

The mind of Christ was a tradition that Paul’s audience knew very well.  One writer in pointing out the stylistic form of the hymn writes, “the linguistic and stylistic evidence goes to show that the hymn was both pre-Pauline and a product of a Jewish-Christian community. There are features which make it likely that is was composed first in a Semitic tongue and later translated into Greek.”[23]  The first half of the hymn (2:6-8) tells the story of Christ’s incarnation, his denial of self and power, him becoming a slave in human form, him being humiliated, his obedience to God by way of dying a death on the cross. The second half of the hymn (2:9-11) explores the exaltation of Christ because of his humility.  He discusses Christ name being above all over names and the universal recognition of his Lordship.  Martin gives the indication that the hymn had a Semitic origin by focusing on the arrangement of the hymn having sections of threes.  He writes

There are three stresses to a line (actually these is true only in his strophes I-IV), three lines to a strophe, three strophes to each part of the entire composition. The first half contains three steps downwards from the Lord’s heavenly state to His humanity and Servanthood and ultimately the humiliation of death itself. And there is the threefold division of the cosmos in v.10.”[24]

Thus, this familiar hymn recalls the whole story of God’s plan of salvation for the entire world through Christ.  The hymn in the context of Paul’s exhortation reminded his readers of the Lordship of Christ over their lives as well as giving them a standard for them to strive to reach in their endeavors to be more humble towards one another.  Paul wanted to relay to his friends that the story of Christ is the foundation of unity.

Rejoice

Another featured theme of the letter is joy and rejoicing. Paul stresses joy revealing the importance of it in his mind.  Within the letter, Paul often references to joy and rejoicing. To name a few, in chapter 1, Paul prays with joy for his friends; in chapter 2, Paul tells his friends to fulfill his joy by being of the same mind; in the same chapter, Paul tells his friends that he plans to send Epaphroditus in order that they may rejoice at seeing him again; in chapter 3, he tell them to rejoice in the Lord; in chapter 4, he commands them to rejoice in the Lord always; and as he concludes his letter, he tell them that he personally rejoice because their concern for him was revived. Throughout the letter to the Philippians, Paul demonstrates that joy and rejoicing is foundational to relationships and fellowship. According to Paul, the basis of joy is the relationship with God and one another, and the Philippians needed to embrace the joy that comes through those relationships. Paul’s reveals his own joy came through his relationship with the Philippians and the Lord. One writer in discussing friendship within the letter states

“Paul had the most delightful ties with his fellow workers. He had foes in plenty, but he also made friends fast and true. In the midst of this epistle Paul talks in a charming way about his plans for communicating with the Philippians, a human touch that breaks the strain of theological argument.  This epistle seems to have no formal or logical order. It flows along in the easiest and most natural way ad treats the weightiest topics and the most incidental with equal ease and grace.”[25]

Robertson points out the fact that the loving fellowship between Paul and the Philippians brought about a tone within this letter that is pleasant and calm.  Although Paul needed to address important issues to the Philippians, he was very confident that his friends would take heed to his exhortation, bringing Paul joy.

Occasion and Purpose

After considering some of the historical context and the literary form of the letter, what is the purpose for Paul’s letter to the Philippians? Gorden Fee raises a significant question concerning Paul writing this letter.  He asks, “Would Paul have written this letter if Epaphroditus were not returning home, having now recovered from his illness?”[26] Gorden makes the argument that Paul would have continued writing this letter even if Epaphroditus was not able to deliver the letter to them because Paul was already planning to send Timothy ahead of him.  Therefore, Gorden believes that “the real purpose of the letter lies with the phrase ‘your progress in the faith’ (1:25), which for Paul ultimately has to do with the progress of the gospel, both in their lives and in their city.”[27] Although Gordon makes comments concerning unity among the Philippians and the opponents of Paul and the Philippians, Gordon places emphasis on the fact that Paul desiring to send Epaphroditus back to them and Paul’s desire to help the Philippians to grow in their faith.

William Hendriksen on the other hand examines the background of the epistle.  Hendriksen first considers Epaphroditus and the Philippians gift.  Paul was very grateful for the gift the Philippians had sent him.  Then, Hendriksen makes some assumptions that upon receiving the gift, Epaphroditus gave an update to Paul concerning the Philippians.  He states “Epaphroditus must also have brought a Report about conditions that prevailed in the Christian community which he had left.”[28] Next, according to Hendriksen, the Philippians church was concerned about Paul’s condition.  Paul was in prison for preaching the gospel; therefore they wanted to make sure they received updates concerning his well-being so that, perhaps they could meet his needs.  Finally, the church might have been concerned about Epaphroditus health since they have heard about him being very ill.

In considering the background of Philippians, Hendriksen shares four purposes for this letter.  First, Hendriksen argues that Paul wrote this letter to express his thanksgiving to the Philippians. The Philippians expressed their love to Paul by seeking to provide for some of his physical needs. Secondly, Paul desired to provide spiritual guidance.  Some opponents to the gospel and division of the Philippians needed addressed.  Paul focused on these issues with confidence that his friends would embrace them. Third, Paul desired to fill the hearts and mind of the Philippians with the spirit of joy. Throughout the entire letter, Paul exhorts them to have joy and he even places himself as an example of someone who has joy. Finally, Paul wanted to prepare the Philippians for the arrival of Epaphroditus. The Philippians sent Epaphroditus to send gifts to Paul and because of his courageous work, he deserved a homecoming from the Philippians.

Peter O’Brien adds to the conversation by stating, “The apostle appears to have had a number of purposes in mind.”[29]  O’Brien, unlike Gordon believes that Paul is not just addressing one issue.  Paul’s letter to the Philippians is a letter where Paul is free to talk with his friends.  Although, there is a structure to this letter, Paul is simply talking to his friends without a mono-purpose. O’Brien like Hendrikson notices four purposes for this letter written by Paul.  O’Brien argues that Paul wrote this letter to encourage the church to welcome Epaphroditus, to provide an update to his friends on his condition, to provide some insights and instructions concerning Paul’s opponent and the false teachers at Philippi, and lastly to encourage his friends to stand fast in the gospel and be unified.

When considering the historical context and the literary form, Paul has several agenda’s in writing this letter. It is emphatically true that Paul desires to share with his friends his current condition, exhort them to rejoice, and be on guard for the dogs that are in Philippi.  Paul has however, a specific focus and intention for writing to his friends. Paul’s focus is to exhort Euodia and Syntyche to live in harmony.  Throughout the letter, Paul makes general statements concerning his opponents (chapter 1), the need to be of the same mind (chapter 2), and the dogs (chapter 3). However in chapter 4, Paul not only exhorts the sisters to live in harmony, but ask the church to help these women as they have struggled with Paul in the work of the gospel. Although the length of Paul’s exhortation to these sisters is relatively short, Paul had confidence that the letter itself would be enough for them to embrace his commands.  For Paul to mention these two women in a letter addressed to bishops, deacons, and members of Philippi[30] adds to the seriousness of this letter exhortation to unity. Therefore, in addition to writing to express thanksgiving to the church for their generosity, Paul had a strong desire to exhort his friends to unity in Christ Jesus.

Theological Implications

Paul’s letter to the Philippians is a letter of encouragement, exhortation, and empowerment. Paul’s agenda is to exhort his friends toward unity on the basis of Christ and his story.  The Christ hymn in chapter 2 is Paul’s ultimate method to grabbing the heart, minds, and attention of the Philippians in order for them to strive toward unity.  The Christ hymns appears as the glue that ties the entire letter together. Every section Paul writes within the book has a relational tie to the Christ hymns.  Paul sharing his updates on his condition and his response to his opponents relates to the Christ hymn. Paul’s exhortations to the Philippians to live according to the gospel and for them to be of the same mind connect to the Christ hymn. Paul’s spiritual guidance for dealing with the false teachers in Philippi ties to the Christ hymn. Paul’s exhortation for them to rejoice and his reflections on him being content is links to the Christ hymn.

Therefore, there is a theological implication springs from this study.  The foundational basis of Christian unity is Christ’s humility and Lordship. Disciples of Christ must humble themselves under the Lordship of Jesus Christ.  This humility within the heart of the members that will benefit the entire church would cause the members to be self-less.  Paul exhorts readers to place others higher than they do themselves. Paul charges them to put their personal preferences second and the desires of others as primary. As Johnson writes,

“The fellowship of Christians is a unity that issues forth from the Holy Spirit, being expressed through self-sacrifice and self-emptying love toward the other. The friendship of Jesus with God, of Jesus with humans, of Paul with the Philippians, of Timothy and Epaphroditus with Paul, and, finally even of the Philippians with Paul, all illustrate this same pattern: not counting oneself above the other leads to service for others.”[31]

To help give a practical perspective on the idea of Christ being the center of Christian unity, let us use the Northside Church of Christ as an example.

Northside Church of Christ

The Northside Church of Christ is a church that resides in suburban North Carolina.  Long-time members who have labored in the church many years comprise the majority of this eldership-led church. The church is located twenty miles from a growing metropolitan city named Charlotte. With many changes occurring surrounding the church, the Elders decided to hire a new pulpit minister by the name of John. John’s job as the new pulpit minister was to oversee the growth of the church through preaching and new members outreach. Within the case story, John appears as a preacher with vision.  He has been the preacher for the Northside church of Christ for two years and is responsible for the changes that have occurred.  He foresaw the changing climate of the communities surrounding the church.  Therefore, he knew what changes the church needed to embrace and implement in order for the church to be relevant within the community.

John, the visionary and progressive leader, observed the world surrounding the church.  It appears that John has studied the community and glimpsed what the community will look like in the future.  John, who the eldership hired to oversee the growth of the church, recognizes that in order for the church to grow numerically, the church must grow out of some traditions and embrace a more relevant culture.

When there is a need for growth, a leader like John understands that the responsibility of
growing a church is not solely the job of one man.  In order for a church to grow spiritual and numerically, it takes an army of ministers of Christ who live and work in the Kingdom of God. Witnessing the life of God in the Kingdom then invites the called and commissioned to serve as ambassadors and servants of Christ to accomplish the work of God in community. Therefore, John decided to hire additional individuals to collaborate with him as he helped guide the people of God to the work and life of God in that community.  John encouraged the church’s Elder-ship to hire Jack and Bob to serve in different ministries, and because of the additional staff, the worship, demographics, and attitude of the congregation began to change.

In many religious organizations, when there is a need for change, spiritual leaders typically encounter resistance.  The changes within the church resulted in it growing out of a traditional church with an older demographic towards more contemporary setting, attracting younger and more diverse group of people. For this reason, the lifelong members of this church were highly upset and spoke with the Eldership concerning John’s leadership.  The senior saints intentionally chose to stagnate the progressive pace of the congregation by going to the elders.  These long-time members obstructed the changes in an attempt to stop the fast pace development of the church.

In an elders’ meeting, Mary and Wayne, the voices of the senior saints, brought their trepidation to the elders concerning the changes occurring within the church.  The older generation felt uncomfortable with the contemporary songs within worship. These contemporary songs in worship opened the doors for a younger generation to come and meet God from their cultural perspective.

In addition to contemporary songs sung in worship, the church felt uneasy with opening their doors and welcoming a group of people that were not like them. For example, Bill, an Elder saw an African American family in their midst during worship. John explained to all those who were in the elders meeting that he was not targeting any particular people or race, but he would talk with anyone who was willing to engage in dialogue.  John was interested in ministering to all kinds of people rather than worry about the color of someone’s skin.  Bill in replying to John informed him that the Northside Church of Christ is a segregated church and that it would always be one.  The attitude of several of the members of the church showed that there were interested in meeting their own needs oppose to participating in the work of God.

In conclusion, If Paul we were to write “the letter to the Philippians”, Paul might have removed some of the soft tone words he used within the original letter and utilized a stronger tone to exhort the entire church to embrace the Christ hymn.  The members of the Northside church must realize that their interest is secondary to not only what others may desire but also to the will and work of God. It appeared that their desires were so strong that over-shadowed the story of Christ in that he died for all so that all might receive salvation. The occasion and purpose of this letter would serve as a disciplinary tool for this church. Paul’s desire for the church to embrace the same mind is based on the Christ hymn. The unity among the Northside church and the acceptance of all men with different personalities and preferences must be predicated on the Christ hymn.

 

Bibliography

 

Bahr, G. J. (1968). Subscriptions in the Pauline letters. Journal Of Biblical Literature, 87(1).

Fee, Gordon, Paul’s Letter to the Philippians. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1995.

Fitzgerald, John T. “Place and Date of Composition.”Page 322 in Philippians, Epistle to the. Vol. 5 of The

Anchor Bible Dictionary. Edited by David Noel Freedman. New York: Doubleday, 1992.

Garland, David E., Longman, Tremper, The Expositors Bible Commentary Vol. 12. Grand Rapids:

Zondervan, 2006.

Getty, Mary, Philippians and Philemon, Wilmington, 1980.

Hawthorne, Gerald F., & Martin, Ralph P. “Authorship.” Word Biblical Commentary: Philippians. Vol 43.

Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2004.

Hendrikson, William, New Testament Commentary: Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, and

                 Philemon. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 1962.

Hendrikson, William, New Testament Commentary: John, Vol 2. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 1983.

Johnson, Luke, The Writings of the New Testament: An Interpretation, 3Rd Ed. Minneapolis: Fortress,

2010.

Martin, Ralph P. The Hymn of Christ: Philippians2:5-11 in Recent Interpretation & in the setting of Early

                Christian Worship. Downer Grove: InterVarsity, 1997.

O’Brien, Peter, The Epistle to the Philippians: A Commentary on the Greek Text. Grand Rapids: Wm.B.

Eerdmans, 1991.

Reed, Jeffrey T. 1996. “Philippians 3:1 and the Epistolary Hesitation Formulas: The Literary Integrity of

Philippians, Again.” Journal Of Biblical Literature 115, no. 1: 63. ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, EBSCOhost (accessed April 20, 2012).

Robertson, Archibald. Paul’s Joy in Christ. Nashville: Broadman, 1960.

 

Saunders, Stanley P. “Christian Friendship and the story of Jesus Christ” Page 504 in vol. 4 of The New

Interpreters Dictionary of the Bible. Edited by Katharine Doob Sakenfeld. 5 vols. Nashville: Abingdon, 1992.

Witherington, Ben, Friendship and Finances in Philippi: The Letter of Paul to the Philippians. Valley Forge:

Trinity, 1994.


[1] Philippians 1:3-5 (The New Revised Standard).

 

[2] Getty, Mary, Philippians and Philemon, Wilmington, 1980), pg. 10.

 

[3] Philippians 1:1 (The New Revised Standard).

 

[4] Bahr, G. J. (1968). Subscriptions in the Pauline letters. Journal Of Biblical Literature, 87(1), 38.

 

[5] Philippians 1:12-13 (The New Revised Standard).

 

[6] Hawthorne, Gerald F., & Martin, Ralph P. “Authorship.” Word Biblical Commentary: Philippians. Vol 43 (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2004), pg. xxix.

 

[7] Philippians 1:12-13 (The New Revised Standard).

 

[8] Reed, Jeffrey T. 1996. “Philippians 3:1 and the Epistolary Hesitation Formulas: The Literary Integrity of Philippians, Again.” Journal Of Biblical Literature 115, no. 1: 63. ATLA Religion Database with ATLASerials, EBSCOhost (accessed April 20, 2012).

 

[9] Fitzgerald, John T. “Place and Date of Composition.”Page 322 in Philippians, Epistle to the. Vol. 5 of The Anchor Bible Dictionary. Edited by David Noel Freedman. New York: Doubleday, 1992.

 

[10] Acts 23:33 (New Revised Standard Version).

 

[11] Acts 24:23 – “Then he ordered the centurion to keep him in custody, but to let him have some liberty and not to prevent any of his friends from taking care of his needs.” (New Revised Standard Version).

 

[12] Garland, David E., Longman, Tremper, The Expositors Bible Commentary Vol. 12 (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2006), pg. 179.

 

[13] Philippians 2:25-27 – “Still, I think it necessary to send to you Epaphroditus – my brother and coworker an fellow soldier, your messenger and minister to my need; for he has been longing for all of you, and has been distressed because you heard that he was ill.” (New Revised Standard Version).

[14] Acts 16:12 – “And from there to Philippi, which is a leading city of the district of Macedonia and a Roman Colony” (New Revised Standard Version).

 

[15] Hendrikson, William, New Testament Commentary: John, Vol 2 (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 1983) pg, 332-323.

 

[16] Acts 16:17 (New Revised Standard Version).

[17] Philippians 1:3-5 (New American Standard Bible).

 

[18] Saunders, Stanley P. “Christian Friendship and the story of Jesus Christ” Page 504 in vol. 4 of The New Interpreters Dictionary of the Bible. Edited by Katharine Doob Sakenfeld. 5 vols. Nashville: Abingdon, 1992.

 

[19] Philippians 1:27 (New Revised Standard Bible).

 

[20] Philippians 2:1-4 – “If then there is any encouragement in Christ, any consolation from love, any sharing in the Spirit, any compassion and sympathy, make my joy complete: be of the same mind, having the same love, being in full accord and of one mind. Do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit, but in humility regard others as better than yourselves. Let each of you look not to your own interests, but to the interests of others.” (New Revised Standard).

 

[21] Philippians 4:2-3 (New Revised Standard Bible).

 

[22] Witherington, Ben, Friendship and Finances in Philippi: The Letter of Paul to the Philippians (Valley Forge: Trinity, 1994), pg. 104.

 

[23] Martin, Ralph P. The Hymn of Christ: Philippians2:5-11 in Recent Interpretation & in the setting of Early Christian Worship (Downer Grove: InterVarsity, 1997), pg. 27.

 

[24] Ralph Martin, A Hymn of Christ, 40.

[25] Robertson, Archibald. Paul’s Joy in Christ (Nashville: Broadman, 1960), pg. 88.

 

[26] Fee, Gordon, Paul’s Letter to the Philippians (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1995), pg. 39.

 

[27] Gordon Fee, Paul’s Letter to the Philippians, 39.

[28] Hendrikson, William, New Testament Commentary: Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, and Philemon, (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 1962) pg, 18.

 

[29] O’Brien, Peter, The Epistle to the Philippians: A Commentary on the Greek Text (Grand Rapids: Wm.B. Eerdmans, 1991), pg. 38.

[30] Philippians 1:1 – “Paul and Timothy, servants of Christ Jesus, to all the saints in Christ Jesus who are in Philippi, with the bishops and deacons.” (New Revised Standard Version).

[31] Johnson, Luke, The Writings of the New Testament: An Interpretation, 3Rd Ed. (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2010), pg. 334.

Case Brief (Revised)

Case Brief

 

Steven J. Brice

Abilene Christian University

BIBM 603.01

Foundations of Theology

Professor Johnson & Thompson

December 9th, 2011

A Common Crisis in a Congregation regarding Change

The decision for a faith community to change in order to be relevant within their communal context has become a common crisis among congregations.  Perhaps this crisis has been common ever since Christ established the church. Hence, the Jews needed to adjust to the Gentiles being a part of the family of God.  A more recent example is the acceptance of African Americans as part of the family of God by Caucasian Americans and vice versa.  God’s people all throughout the history of the church had to deal with change of some sort.  Change has become a part of the story of God in His kingdom.  God has allowed His people to come face to face with theology and culture.  God does not hide His people from the constant transitions and transcendence of the world.  Yet, He allows His people to make the decisions to see if personal theology must change in such a way where culture may see the relevancy of God.  Can everyday theology be formed in such a way that the world may see that the “God of the past” is also the “God of the present”?

Northside Church of Christ

An example of a common crisis within a church regarding change is the case of the Northside Church of Christ in North Carolina.  The Northside Church of Christ is a church that resides in suburban North Carolina.  This eldership-led church is primarily filled with seasoned saints that have labored in that congregation for many years.  The church is located twenty miles from a growing metropolitan city named Charlotte. With many changes occurring surrounding the church, the Elders decided to hire a new pulpit minister by the name of John.

John’s job as the new pulpit minister was to oversee the growth of the church through
preaching and new members outreach. Within the case story, John appears to be a preacher with vision.  He has been the preacher for the Northside church of Christ for two years and is responsible for the changes that have occurred.  He foresaw the changing
climate of the communities surrounding the church.  Therefore, he knew what changes the church needed to embrace and implement in order for the church to be relevant within
the community.  John, the visionary and progressive leader observes the world that is surrounding the church.  It appears that John has studied the community and sees’ a glimpse of what the community will look like in the future.  John, whom the elders hired to
oversee the growth of the church, recognizes that in order for the church to grow numerically, the church must grow out of some traditions and embrace a more relevant culture.

When there is a need for growth, leaders like John understand that the responsibility of
growing a church is not solely the job of one man.  In order for a church to grow spiritual and numerically, it takes an army of ministers of Christ who live and work in the Kingdom of God.  The witnessing of the life of God in the Kingdom will then invite those who are called and commissioned to serve as ambassadors and servants of Christ to accomplish the work of God in that community.  Therefore, John decided to hire additional individuals to collaborate with him as he helped guide the people of God to the work and life of God in that community.  John encouraged the church’s Elder-ship to hire Jack and Bob to serve in different ministries because of the additional staff, the worship, demographics, and attitude of the congregation began to change.

In many religious organizations, when there is a need for change, spiritual leaders typically encounter resistance.  The changes within the church resulted in it growing out of a traditional church with an older demographic towards more contemporary setting, attracting younger and more diverse group of people. For this reason, the lifelong members of this church were highly upset and spoke with the Eldership concerning John’s leadership.  The senior saints intentionally stagnated the progressive pace of the congregation by going to the elders.  These long-time members obstructed the changes in an attempt to stop the fast pace development of the church.

In an elders’ meeting, Mary and Wayne, the voices of the senior saints, brought their trepidation to the elders concerning the changes occurring within the church.  The older generation were felt uncomfortable with the contemporary songs within worship. These contemporary songs in worship were opening the doors for a younger generation to be able to come and meet God from their cultural perspective.

In addition to contemporary songs sung in worship, the church felt uneasy with opening their doors and welcoming a group of people that were not like them. For example, Bill, an Elder saw an African American family in their midst during worship. John explained to all those who were in the elders meeting that he was not targeting any particular people or race, but he would talk with anyone who was willing to engage in dialogue.  John was interested in ministering to all kinds of people rather than worry about the color of
someone’s skin.  Bill in replying to John informed him that the Northside Church of Christ is a segregated church and that it would always be one.  The attitude of several of the members of the church shows a lack of interest in being a part of the ministry of reconciliation. If this attitude that was in opposition to the ministry of reconciliation
became prevalent, it would a global effect. George Yancey in discussing Christ’s prayer for unity among believers writes, “The opposite of Jesus’ prayer can happen as well.  If Christians do not become one, the world will fail to know that Jesus has been sent by the Father.”[1]  Christians must embrace a ministry of reconciliation in order to more fully express the love of Christ. Because of the attitudes expressed within the elder’s meeting, John felt he had a tough decision to make.  John could choose to forfeit his theology of the Kingdom of God, life, and mission for the comfort of the longtime members and the security of his job.  Alternatively John could refuse to be stagnant and irrelevant in a growing community and immerse himself somewhere else.  The case is a common crisis within congregations that are facing change.  Change has and will forever be a struggle to
many who are content with how things normally are.

Theology of Communal Change

When a group of people become accustomed to a culture and embraced it as life, the
challenges of implementing a new custom is legitimate.  Within the Old Testament, we see a story of God working and dealing with His people, the Children of Israel.  The narrative of the Old Testament reveals that God instilled into His people a way of life.  Hence, the laws of God were a way of life.  One passage says “Happy are those whose way is blameless, who walk in the law of the Lord.”[2]  God’s chosen people, lived under the law of God, and this law was their custom. Within the New Testament, Jesus introduced a new teaching, a new law, and a new way of living that over shadowed the old teachings, the old law, and the old way of life.

A man who claimed to be the Messiah introduced a new way of living.  His disciples went all over the known world to proclaim the Lordship of Christ.  These teachings explained that people were no longer righteous (saved) by the works of the law, but by the grace of God. Within this new way of life, every Jew and non-Jew had access to God.  As result of this new life, an enormous crisis arose within the church. The Jews wanted to accept Christ yet wanted to uphold the old way of life.  In addition to this, they wanted the Gentiles to not only accept Christ but also embrace the old way of life.  All through the teachings and writing of the New Testament, Paul would combat and confront these teachings by reminded the Jews and the Gentiles that in Christ there is a new way of living.

The new way of life in Christ encouraged and commanded the Jews to accept all men just as Christ accepts all men.  Upon Christ’s death on the cross, God reveals his plan for unification when, “the curtain of the temple was torn in two, from top to bottom.”[3]  To the Jews, the curtain or veil had a significant meaning behind it.  It was the curtain within the temple that hid the very presence of God.  Only the High Priest had access once a year
to offer sacrifices to God for the sins of the people.  If one entered into the presence of God, without the proper accolades, the immediate results was death.  When Christ died on the cross, the curtain split from the top to bottom leaving what kept hidden the presence of God exposed to everybody.

When Christ died, the Holy of Holies was not just exposed to the High Priest and Jews, but also exposed the Gentiles to the presence of God.  Therefore through Christ all men are drawn to God. In fact, it does not matter what nationality or family origin one is; in Christ everyone is a new creation.  Because God revealed the love of Christ to all men through Christ, all men are reconciled to God, Paul says “From now on, therefore, we regard no one from a human point of view…”[4] This was a constant difficulty for the Jews.  The Jews were so proud to be a Jews that they did not want to let go of their nationality to embrace other nationalities. Paul continues saying “if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come.”[5]

For Jews, this was quite an adjustment.  To change their way of life to embrace a new customs to maintain the unity within the church was challenging.  The work of God through the cross of Christ is bringing all men to one body creating a new culture and a new way of life.  To love all men and be in fellowship with all men has become a common crisis in congregations that are looking into change.  The common crisis does not look the same for every congregation; however, there are commonalities within the diverse situations.  Therefore, if churches are going to join God in His new creation and new culture, the
church must remember that this is the work of God.  One writer states that, “It was God who authored human diversity.  This fact calls all of us to deal with cultural diversity, see it as he sees it – as good – and honor it as handiwork of the wise and sovereign Creator.”[6]  Christianity appears to be about the ministry of reconciliation.  God invites and even
commands for those who have been reconciled to be work within the ministry of
reconciliation.  One writer in discussing the lifestyle of reconciliation states, “The Word of God is not just saying that reconciliation is a good idea. Rather, Paul informs us that the ministry of reconciliation is a mandatory part of every Christian’s daily living.”[7]  The ministry of reconciliation does not discriminate with age, nationality, or color.

Churches that believe in the Gospel of Christ must realize that the goodness draws all men to Christ.  The era of racial, theological, and age-segregated churches are not what God designed the church to be.  God through Christ purposed for the church to embrace all kinds of people.  From a missionalogical perspective, “a hermeneutical method to give congregations a mean of reliably focusing their evangelism on a Christ-centered gospel – a method that, instead of seeking new ways of faith sharing, make the starting point of evangelism the gospel itself, thereby releasing much latent power and grace, and more surely avoiding the snares of enculturation.”[8]

Remedy for the Crisis

In the case of the Northside church, John might have attempted to move too quickly.  John was the Northside church pulpit minister for only two years.  Perhaps the church had
not fully adjusted to John or even fully trusted him.  This is not to say that the church was
cautious or suspicious of John, but that the relationship between John and the church had not fully developed.  Gilbert Rendle relates an illustration of a sales person attempting to sell some appliances to a customer to the situation of a minister trying to lead a congregation to change.. Rendle states

if you go to a store to buy a refrigerator – and you happen to be in a store that actually still has salespeople – the salesperson will quite naturally want and need to learn about
you before beginning the conversation about the kind of refrigerator you want to buy.  By learning about you, the salesperson will then be able to educate you about what you need … If it takes such work to buy a refrigerator, which is fairly basic and standard part of our homes, consider what is takes to understand a congregation and its specific
call to ministry.”[9]

Perhaps John needed to spend more time immersed in his ministry context and slowly led the people of God into recognizing the life and work of God thereby encouraging them to participate in the work.  The people needed more time to see Gods will for an inclusive and loving church to be able to reflect and embrace it.  It is vitally important that leaders slowly guide a group of people through vision. When God shares a vision to a leader, the people who have a heart after God will slowly realize what God would want them to do.  It is through the avenue of vision where citizens of the Kingdom of God will see that the life and work of God is bigger than they are.  One writer puts it like this, “It is vision that takes us beyond ourselves, putting our lives in the context of eternity…”[10]  When the people of God become aware of the vision of God, they come into the mind of God. They begin to see how God views this world and what He would like the world to become.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the mission of God for reconciliation needs to continue toward completion because the influence of the devil on earth is too prevalent.  John must wrap himself in the heart and mind of the Spirit and therefore be led by Him. Though it appears that John and the congregation are walking on two different spiritual trails, John must not allow the frustrations of the congregation distract him from his communion with God.  John must follow the example of Moses and retreat to the mountain of God and wait for His presence to shine and direct him in the way he should go.

 

 

 

 

 

Bibliography

  1. The Holy Bible (New Revised Standard Version & New American Standard Bible).
  2. Elmer, Duane, Cross-Cultural Conflict: Building Relationships for Effective Ministry. Illinois: Downers Grove, 1993.
  3. Gaede, S., Belonging. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1985.
  4. Kehrein, Glen and Washington, Raleigh, Breaking Down Walls: A Model for
    Reconciliation in an Age of Racial Strife
    . Chicago: Moody, 1993.
  5. Rendle, Gilbert, Leading Change in the Congregation: Spiritual and Organizational  Tools for Leaders. Herndon: The Alban Institute, 1998.
  6. Watson, David L. “Christ All in All: The Recovery of the Gospel for Evangelism in the United States.” Pages 177-197 in The Church Between Gospel and Culture: The Emerging Mission in North America. Edited by George R. Hunsburger & Craig V. Gelder. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996.
  7. Yancey, George, Beyond Racial Gridlock. Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2006.

 


[1] Yancey, George, Beyond Racial Gridlock (Downers Grove: InterVarsity, 2006), pg. 114.

[2] Psalm 119:1 (N.R.S.V).

[3] Mark 15:38 (N.R.S.V).

[4] II Corinthians 5:16 (N.R.S.V).

[5] II Corinthians 5:17 (N.A.S.B).

[6] Elmer, Duane, Cross-Cultural Conflict: Building Relationships for Effective Ministry (Illinois: Downers Grove, 1993), pg. 23.

[7] Kehrein, Glen and Washington, Raleigh, Breaking Down Walls: A Model for Reconciliation in an Age of Racial Strife (Chicago: Moody, 1993), pg. 107.

[8] Watson, David L. “Christ All in All: The Recovery of the Gospel for Evangelism in the United States.” Pages 177-197 in The Church Between Gospel and Culture: The Emerging Mission in North America. Edited by George R. Hunsburger & Craig V. Gelder. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996, pg. 187.

 

[9] Rendle, Gilbert, Leading Change in the Congregation: Spiritual and Organizational Tools for Leaders (Herndon: The Alban Institute, 1998), pg. 6-7.

[10] Gaede, S., Belonging (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1985), pg. 155.

Ethnography Excercise #2

Description

Setting

Sunday, November 13th, 2011 I preached at the Southern Hills church of Christ Sundown service here in Abilene.  The worship service was in a chapel room with about fifty individuals.  The pulpit minister who invited me to speak was present along with a few of the elders of the church.  The environment was a more intimate and relational other than the environment in the bigger auditorium.  Within the larger auditorium where the church worships in the morning, one can easily be lost in the crowd.

The Action

Due to the fact the demographics of those in the audience were seasoned, the song selections were more traditional.  Occasionally, the worship leader invited us to stand while praising God in songs.  There seems to be no physical expressions from the members.  While preaching, the audience was completely silent; however facial expressions of smiles and head nods informed me that they understand and agreed with the message.

The Speech

The worship service was led by the men and some of the elders of the church.  The elders had more of the leading roles within the worship service.  During the welcome, various prayers, song service, and shepherd’s prayers an Elder repeatedly made reference to the theme of my message: hope.  As the audience were preparing and expecting a message that focused on hope, every man that lead in an aspect of worship made reference to the hope that we have in Christ.

Reflection

As I reflected on my visit to the Southern Hills church of Christ, I notice that the church seeks to invite everyone to experience life in Christ.  Whether one is theologically conservative or liberal and whether one is a regular church member or is unchurched, Southern Hills opens their arms to everyone.  As a part of their mission statement, Southern Hills seeks to be God front porch.  They seek to invite all to be a part of God work in the world.  The small group that met at the Sundown service opened their arms to me and invited me to be a part of their family.  They invited me to experience life with them.  Being away from home, I appreciated their open gesture because it gave me an awareness that Abilene can truly be a “home away from home.”

Formational Goals (Revised)

Formational Goals

  • After reviewing the results of my interview, I believe that it is necessary and important for me to have more of an open mind & spirit.  This is a necessity in order for me to fully be able to embrace my studies and witness God forming me into the servant He desires me to be in His kingdom.
  • A long-term goal of mine is to use the training and academics received here at ACU to better prepare me for Kingdom life and work in the Northeastern area of the United States.
  • A short-term goal that I presently have is to make sure God is first in my life.  It has been a challenge for me to keep the Lord first because of the demands of academics.
  • To learn more about Missions. To become more sensitive to God’s calling, sending, working, and invitation within a given context.

Ethnography Exercise #1

 

 

 

 Description

Setting

Sunday, October 09th, 2011, I attended and was scheduled to preach at the Cedar Hill church of Christ in Cedar Hill, Texas. The Cedar Hill church of Christ is located in a growing suburban area. Cedar Hill is fifteen miles away from Dallas and is becoming one of the most popular areas to visit. Many are relocating to Cedar Hill because of the rapid changes that promote spirituality, economics, and community. The mayor of the city is one of the Shepherds of the Cedar Hill church of Christ. He has been mayor for over twenty-five years. With his love for the Lord and his influential position, the city of Cedar Hill is known for being a city that reverences God.
The place of worship for the Cedar Hill church members seems to have an ideal appearance for a traditional church. There are vision statements printed on the walls, common church pews, a communion table, and projector screens on the walls. The church had a diverse population of Caucasian, African Americans, and Hispanics. There is a good balance between season adults, middle age adults, young adults, youth, and pre-teens. The Cedar Hill church is a growing diverse population.

The Action

The song service had a healthy blend of traditional and contemporary songs. Sporadically, the worship leader invited us to stand while praising God in songs. Most of the members didn’t express worship through physical motions, but a few raised their hands and said Amen. While preaching, the audience was verbally expressing agreement and confirmation of the ideas and principles driven from the text.

The Speech

The worship service was led by the men and elders of the church. The elders had more of the leading roles within the worship service. During the welcome, various prayers, song service, and shepherd’s prayers an Elder repeatedly made reference to God’s love and His grace. When I noticed the speech of the Elders throughout the worship service, I began to share my thoughts which reflected on God’s love and His grace for us.

Reflection

As I reflected on my visit to the Cedar Hill church of Christ, I began to realize that this church is a growing diverse congregation that is striving to promote God’s love and be relevant to all men. While it appears that this church is conservative, there are also hints that this church is striving to be flexible. They appear to have an appreciation for the grace of God.  The vision statements that are printed on walls of the auditorium shows that the Elders are striving to be more progressive in their approach to being relevant within the body of believers that consist of the Cedar Hill church and also the residence that live in the city of Cedar Hill. The vision statements printed on the wall is a constant reminder that the church is seeking to “reach beyond the ordinary to serve an extra-ordinary God”.

Ministerial Identity Paper (Revised)

Introduction

It was on December 29th, 1999 when I decided to give my life over to Jesus.  I knew all the fundamental facts of the gospel, the “Church of Christ” teachings, and about salvation (I had pretty good bible school teachers). During the latter part of the year 1999, more of my youth group friends were giving their lives over to Jesus. In addition to that, there was an enormous scare around the world. People believed that when the year 2000 arrived that the world may “shut down and end”.  Knowing what I knew about God, heaven, and hell, I walked down the aisle and gave the preacher my hand and God my heart.  I knew that if I were to die then, I would go straight to hell.  And so I obeyed the gospel of Jesus Christ on December 29th, 1999 at the age of eleven.

In the midst of all of that, around the age of thirteen, for some unknown reason, I decided to listen to the preacher.  David Wilson is a precise, studious expositor of the Word.  His messages were always relevant expositions driven from the text.  At the age of thirteen, he was heavily preaching on the topic of “Purpose.”  At a young age, the things that were mention blew my mind and caused me to question the purpose of my own existence. After months of child-like prayers and tears flowing from my eyes, for some unknown reason, I woke up from a nap one day I said, “I want to be a preacher.”  The following Sunday, I decided to inform the preacher of my desire to preach. He took me under his wings and we walked together learning the craft of preaching.  I began preaching at the age of sixteen and was well on my journey to becoming a preacher.

David Wilson in a series of teachings, drills, and discussions shared with me all that he knew about expository preaching and teaching.  As a result of his consistent mentor-ship, he used me frequently to preach in his absence.  The more I preached, the more I grew in passion and capability in preaching. After every sermon, I received constructive criticism that gave me an opportunity to learn from my mistakes.

Exposure to Exposition & Relevance

David Wilson was trained intensively by Arnelious Crenshaw, minister of the Northeast church of Christ in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.  Arnelious Crenshaw instilled within David Wilson the importance, vitality, and effectiveness of expository preaching and relevant ministry. David Wilson, after being trained relocated to Brooklyn, New York to serve the Kings church as their minister. From his first sermon, Bro. Wilson showed the congregation that he wasn’t re-locating to New York City to be stagnant and ineffective.  I remember him sharing with the congregation that he was on a mission and that he expects disciples to be a part of the mission that he believed that God was placing in his heart.

As a young man growing up under the ministry of Bro. Wilson it was an experience that has and is shaping my identity as a minister and my passion for ministry.  Bro. Wilson introduced and executed a ministry of discipline, focus, vision, purpose, structure, and relevance.  I witnessed the church grow from a sloppy and lazy structure (which was prior to his coming) to a ministry that believes in excellence.  Everything that came out of the mouth of Bro. Wilson was about mission, purpose, and vision.  Even though as a young man, I really didn’t appreciate the ministry I was brought up in, I was truly aware of what was going on.  As I began to embrace my calling and zeal for ministry, I began to be immersed in the ministry context of the Kings church.  At the age of sixteen, I began to be involved in the retention and shepherding ministry.  Within this ministry, the men who were
training to be elders were already doing the work of a shepherd.  I was serving as an assistant to those who were shepherding the flock.  This was made possible because one aspect of the vision that Bro. Wilson had for the church was that while men were being trained for leadership, young men needed to be exposed to what is looks like to be a leader.  In addition to my participation in the shepherding ministry, I was also involved in the men’s empowerment, disciple-makers, and pulpit ministries.

As stated before, I believe that the location of my birth, the ministry context I was
placed in, and the experiences I’ve received within that day and time shaped my thinking and perspective of what ministry looks like.  The idea of a ministerial identity looks more like a person of God who has been consecrate to the call of Christ.  I believe that the actions or lifestyle of a consecrated individual is when one immerses themselves in seasons of prayer, study, meditation, and fasting. I believe that a lifestyle of consecration to Christ opens the heart and mind of God which result to God pouring out His vision into the heart and mind of the consecrated servant.  I believed this to be true at a young age and began to annually fast and diligently seek the heart and mind of Christ.  Stories in the Bible like Nehemiah and Esther were close to my heart and served as guiding pillars for my journey in consecration.  Even to this day, I schedule an annual season of fasting and prayer.

Experience in the South

It was August of 2006 where I left my home to enroll into Southwestern Christian College in Terrell, Texas.  While working on my bachelors, I served as a youth minister at the Cedar Crest church of Christ in Dallas, Texas.  In addition to that, I was travelling frequently around Texas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana to preach at any given Sunday and at special occasions.  Upon graduating in May 2010, I participated in a yearlong delightful internship with the Cedar Hill church of Christ in Cedar Hill, Texas.

Throughout my travels and ministerial experience, I saw something that was dishearten to me.  With much respect to my brothers and sisters in the above locations, I saw a lot of religion but a lack of discipleship.  I witness division upon brethren and I saw the poor oppressed.  I saw churches with large facilities, but with empty pews.  I witness popular preachers highly respected at different venues but hardly known by their own people.  I saw and sat through glamorous gospel meetings and lectureships but witness the poor oppressed and unchurch people untouched for Christ.

As a result of my experience within the bible-belt and/or the south, a greater passion grew within me to focus on the northeast.  Though my experience in the South wasn’t completely a disturbing one, I felt that the countless number of churches of Christ on “every corner” was enough.  I felt in my heart that communities didn’t need more congestion of divided churches warring against each other for members.  I felt in my heart that I needed to one day accept the environment of church politics and church battles and focus on entering into a place that has been abandoned, neglected, and overlooked.

The calling

The more I ponder on my experience in the South, the more I begin to see why I was born in the Northeast.  There is a reason why I was born and raised in the northeastern area of United States.  I saw firsthand the constant spiritual drought that plagued the entire tri-state (NY, NJ, and Conn.) area including the various neighboring states.  I saw firsthand the extreme difficulties to do ministry in this highly populated, highly expensive, and highly regulated part of the United States.  I saw why many servants didn’t want to serve here because it was and is easier to prosper and be fruitful in ministry in the south.  In the south, the seeds religion has already been planted within the hearts of people.  In other words, the south is already filled with “religious” individuals.  A disciples, than will simply have to water that plant and God will give the increase.  Though that may seem ideal,
from my observation, there wasn’t many churches that were doing this.   I’ve seen lectureships that were designed to confined people to a set of rules and teachings rather then lectureships that focus on learning more about effective ministries.  I’ve seen churches split and fight over pity things while the surrounding neighborhood is still “left for dead” with no hope.

The Northeast

Ever since I decided to give my life over to the ministry of Christ, I’ve always have had a passion and desire to serve in the northeastern area.  As my passion grew for the northeast, I began to study different ministries that were targeting New York City.  I noticed that many churches and academic institutions where focused on New York City area.  I was impressed and encouraged by the vision of many who saw and knew the need for ministry in that area.

In witnessing a growing desire by many to serve in New York City, there was something inside of me that desired to pick another area that had a need.  I knew that my personality fit more in a multi-ethnic diverse metropolitan area.  Therefore, I began to look at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Philadelphia has a rich history that is filled with art, music, and a diverse population.  I prayerfully looked into Philadelphia and made a commitment to visit the area once a year to get more familiar with the area.

The summer of 2011 was my first visit to Philadelphia and I heard and saw the calling of God to serve in ministry in that location.  The trip showed me that the growing contemporary city was desperately in need for Christianity.  As I was touring the city, I thought to myself: If I was to come here, serve, and disciple people to Christ, then I will have to come with a missional mindset. Therefore, I believe that God has placed me a journey that is heading toward south Philadelphia to plant a ministry

Ever since I plugged my eyes on Philadelphia, I have grown to have this burning desire to be a servant there.  I truly do not know what my ministerial identity will be if the Lord calls me to serve in Philadelphia.  I believe that is it through me being consecrated to Christ and being immersed in the context of Philadelphia where I will begin to see the identity that I must have in order for me to be effective.  With possibly a few more items that maybe added to the list, I do not believe that the recognition of my ministerial identity will occur separate and apart from a consecrated life and an immersion into the context of communities in Philadelphia.

My constant struggle

If I were to be honest, I sometimes struggle with my passion and ‘calling’. I often wonder if my passion and calling has been tainted by selfishness; my “buy-in” to believing that the Northeast has an enormous need for ministry; and if “just picking Philadelphia” was the best way to go about deciphering my calling.  I often ask myself questions like: 1. Is this truly what God really want me to do?  2. Aren’t I too young to know what I’ll be doing in life?  3. Why does it seem like everyone else says they’re “not sure what God want them to do in the future…” but they’re open to His calling?  4. Why do I seem so sure that I’m going to Philadelphia?  5. Why am I struggling with this “calling”?  I have decided therefore to be more humble and “slow to speak” concerning God calling.  Is this the right approach or is it a lack of trust and a self-centered focus?

Conclusion

I believe that God positioned my birth in the northeast; revealed an enormous need for ministry to be done in the northeast; led me to experience life and ministry in the south; and allowed me to have a burning desire for Philadelphia for a reason.  I believe that the Lord positioned me at Abilene Christian University to learn, grow, and experience a Graduate School of Theology Masters of Arts in Divinity with a concentration of Missions degree so that I will be expose both to academics as well as the practice of ministry.

While I struggle from time to time with my “calling” and my “identity” as a minister, I believe that the journey here in Abilene will be added variables to my transformation as a servant of Christ.  As stated before, I will take a more humble and open stance when it comes down to God’s calling for my life.  Instead of me stressing about tomorrow, I will focus on today and praise him for today.  I don’t have to worry about tomorrow because God is already there and He has it covered.

 

Welcome to ACU Blogs

Welcome to your new portfolio blog. This is your first post. Once you are familiar with the process of creating content on the blog, you can edit or delete it to get started.

For help getting around WordPress and customizing your new portfolio blog, start with the ACU Blogs support page to walk you through editing the blog from the WordPress Dashboard.

A Note on Privacy

Portfolios, by definition, are collections of quality work for public display. Your new portfolio blog is publicly visible on the web (though not searchable by Google), but there are a few things you can do to keep work private until you’re ready to publish.

  1. Once you are finished editing a post or page, you can use the Save Draft button to save content not ready for public view.
  2. You can also edit the Visibility to publish a Private or Password-Protected post.

When you are ready to make private posts public where faculty, students, or future employers can see your work, it’s as simple as hitting the big Publish button.

For all other questions, come by the Learning Studio lab during staff hours and we’ll be happy to work with you.
.