{"id":453,"date":"2018-03-08T07:07:40","date_gmt":"2018-03-08T13:07:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blogs.acu.edu\/staffsenate\/?p=453"},"modified":"2023-01-31T15:27:19","modified_gmt":"2023-01-31T21:27:19","slug":"03-08-18","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.acu.edu\/staffsenate\/2018\/03\/08\/03-08-18\/","title":{"rendered":"03.08.18 Meeting Minutes"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Staff Senate Meeting Minutes<br \/>\nMarch 8, 2018<\/p>\n<p>In Attendance:  Chris Ballard, Dave Beard, Emily Berry, Eric Gumm, Kathy Redman, Scott Delony, Stephanie Woodlee, Tina Chisholm, Will Wyatt,* Ex Officio \u2013 Prentice Ashford, Cindy Gravitt, Grant Abston, Steve Rowlands, Jill Fortson, Aubree Browning, Shannon Kaczmarek, D&#8217;Angelo Sands, Debbie Stewart<\/p>\n<p>Call to Order<br \/>\nPrayer<br \/>\nApproval of Minutes<br \/>\nOld Business<br \/>\nV. New Business<br \/>\nAbout my role exercise &#8211; Jill Fortson<br \/>\nHistory of career services &#8211; priorities change from time to time.  Career Center does not \u201cget students jobs\u201d, they do not \u201cplace\u201d students because there are actually schools getting sued for \u201cplacement.\u201d<br \/>\nCareer center has to prove their ROI.  They report outcomes and how students are doing, which is difficult once they have graduated.  The government is also using that data for their \u201cscorecard\u201d.<br \/>\nHelp students create resumes, but also help them gain needed skills by integrating into the faculty.  Skills such as agility.<br \/>\nGen Z is coming in now and they have different expectations than millenials.<br \/>\nAlot of people don\u2019t understand what we do. New students sometime don\u2019t even know there is a career center.<br \/>\nIt\u2019s about students thrive while they are here and when they graduate.  We also work with alumni and provide services for online students also.<br \/>\nOnline students are often career changers.<br \/>\nAubree &#8211; I get to see how many people come to interview ACU students because they appreciate the quality of ACU students.  They have developed awesome relationships with companies that often end up hiring ACU students<br \/>\nHandshake is our new software and will filter experiential learning really well.<br \/>\nHandshake is a network created by some students from Michigan Tech to even the playing field for students from smaller schools.  We increased our job postings by 255% and have 3500 jobs posted right now.  It has streamlined our processes<\/p>\n<p>How many people in your office?  I report to Chris, two staff members and a post grad intern.  Two undergrad students that run the first desk.<\/p>\n<p>Handshake is on the career center website and alum can have access.  It is single sign-on and they can change their email address when they graduate.<\/p>\n<p>B.  Recognition and Development<br \/>\n Letter from employee shared asking about the staff senate having the backs of employees when it comes to policy\/procedure.<br \/>\nThree faculty senate members were invited to SLT meetings beginning this year.  Would they consider inviting staff senate members?  Stephanie believes we just need to have a conversation about it &#8211; that is where it starts.  It would be most appropriate for the chair to have that conversation.  Jill &#8211; but there inlies the issue.  The fact that we don\u2019t have a seat at the table says a lot. Why doesn\u2019t the SLT want to pursue a relationship with staff?<br \/>\nDebbie &#8211; It is so important for staff to have a voice is because academics has a centralized office &#8211; Provost office.<br \/>\nEmily &#8211; we are twice the size as the faculty.<br \/>\nEric &#8211; notice the disparity between exempt and non-exempt staff in the survey results. Faculty is a unit and has one voice.  One reason Faculty has a seat at the table is the issue of tenure.  Financial changes butts up against tenure.  Faculty is hired through a different process.  There has historically been more of a staff voice, this is a time a conversation needs to be had.<br \/>\nChris &#8211; I will think about how I will ask Dr. Schubert.  I would love to hear his thoughts on this idea of perception.<br \/>\nStephanie &#8211; We ask for the questions in advance, so please submit those before our meeting with Dr. Schubert.  Does anyone have some examples of  where staff had a voice?  The LGBT survey was facilitated by staff, Sticky notes at Town Hall meeting.<br \/>\nJill &#8211; we do have a voice more than it seems.  But what is the perception out there.<br \/>\nSick to service was brought to HR by staff.<br \/>\nStephanie &#8211; If there are changes people want to make, I would like to invite them to serve on staff senate<br \/>\nSteve &#8211; THis is a good survey finding out staff needs and wants.<br \/>\nI am going to walk through the survey itself.  Two main points:  Job satisfaction and Benefits<br \/>\nData has been compiled into a spreadsheet in effort to find trends.  Committee was iced out when they were scheduled to meet but they will meet today to make some observations and suggestions based off the data.<br \/>\nEmily &#8211; 2016 would have had more exempt employees and 2017 would have an increase in non-exempt employees.<br \/>\nEric &#8211; what percentage did exempt and non-exempt staff hold?<br \/>\nThere is uptick in 2017 of exempt staff.<br \/>\nSteve &#8211; My goal is to analyze it to make some recommendations to staff senate and senior leadership.<br \/>\nChris &#8211; do we need supplemental questions?<br \/>\nSteve &#8211; THere are already a lot of questions and I don\u2019t want to ruin our data baseline.  I think we could follow up with staff and ask more intentional questions.<br \/>\nThis is an opportunity to show staff that we are looking at the data and care about their thoughts and we noticed these questions scored low &#8211; what\u2019s behind that?<br \/>\nAlso, i think we have a great opportunity that Stephanies whole committee is going to rotate off this year and there will be no one to lead the way for that particular<br \/>\nEric &#8211; you can &#8211; you can have committee members that are not senators according to the bylaws<br \/>\nSteve &#8211; how do we have continuity for committees?<br \/>\nStephanie &#8211; I think this is where our google drive will be very helpful<br \/>\nSteve &#8211; Did you know _________\u2019s house burned down completely recently and he is living in a storae shed?<br \/>\n anyone know about that??  I saw a gofundme account to help with<br \/>\nCan ACU help out?  When someone\u2019s house was struck by lightning, ACU helped a family by letting them live in an apartment at a prorated rate.<br \/>\nShannon &#8211; I think that it is an incredible way to help someone feel connected when something crazy happens and there is a repsponse.<br \/>\nSteve &#8211; it\u2019s the little things that often mean alot.  We are in a high anxiety environment right now and we need to pray for our leaders and the hard choices that are being made.<br \/>\nIf you could take some time to go over this data and let me know if there is anything you noticed.<br \/>\nStephanie &#8211; I am not sure what our policy is through HR to help raise awareness for fellow employees when crisis occurs.<br \/>\nSteve &#8211; I don\u2019t know the criteria<br \/>\nStephanie &#8211; I don\u2019t know why staff senate couldn\u2019t be an avenue to raise awareness for staff members in need.<br \/>\nSteve &#8211; I think the question is always how much to communicate.<br \/>\nStephanie &#8211; faculty senate has a newsletter.  Could we have a newsletter?<br \/>\nEric &#8211; they have had one this year.<br \/>\nStephanie &#8211; I think we should start a staff senate newsletter and that is where we can share these things.<br \/>\nBen &#8211; What if it was part of the HR newsletter and there was a link to the newsletter<br \/>\nSteve &#8211; I want to appreciate how busy we are and it is difficult to take on alot of these things.<br \/>\nStephanie &#8211; If you would forward me that link that would be helpful and maybe I can spread the word.<br \/>\nChris &#8211; You have a point that new senators come through the door and we ask them what committee they want to be on?<br \/>\nDeangelo &#8211; maybe we could email a list of committees and descriptions prior to the first meeting.<br \/>\nChris &#8211; Let\u2019s go out and get more staff members to help with the committees<br \/>\nShannon &#8211; it definitely creates buy-in<br \/>\nEmily &#8211; Phil Schubert meeting &#8211; based on the meeting yesterday, I am thinking that he is going to come in and want to talk about the sexual stewardship issue.  And I think we have a short window of time with him and I don\u2019t want to spend that time talking about sexual stewardship because we are going to be hearing a lot about that from a lot of other meetings.  I am looking forward to meet with Dr. Schubert, but I don\u2019t want to talk about just that issue with him.<br \/>\nChris &#8211; I don\u2019t think we got to ask a lot of questions.  We need to make sure we submit questions.<br \/>\nStephanie &#8211; Submit all your questions to Chris two weeks before the meeting on April 18.  Should we open this up to all the staff and ask them to send us their questions so we can relay them to Dr. Schubert?<br \/>\nEric &#8211; I think the key is to think about what are the issues that staff is dealing with that we would like to put before him.  For example, the outsourcing.  That will potentially have a huge impact on staff and on the campus<br \/>\nWill &#8211; Grounds, IT, food services.  It was interesting to me that we spent 45 minutes talking about sexual stewardship and 1 sentence about outsourcing half the staff.  THis will impact Faculty as well.  People have an expectation of what it means to work here and the coworkers you have and it\u2019s being significantly shaken up.  Yesterday, they were pushing hard to implement outside companies the beginning of April.<br \/>\nIs April 18 too late for our meeting with Dr. Schubert?<br \/>\nStephanie &#8211; I don\u2019t know what our meeting would impact regarding this.<br \/>\nEric -Would our meeting be better to focus on dealing with the fallout of so many staff being let go<br \/>\nEmily &#8211; I want to feel like I am allowed to challenge this and we are just now asking these questions because we have not been communicated with.<br \/>\nWill &#8211; 77 employees represent a number and they may find that number by outsourcing a significant number of staff.<br \/>\nChris &#8211; If we can do it earlier, i think we should do it earlier.<br \/>\nSteve:  I think our goal needs to be to get information.<br \/>\nBen:  Can we have a meeting with directors with departments that need to outsource?<br \/>\nWill: this started being talked about in November and it will be decided in two weeks.  Hindsight is 20\/20 but we should have been talking about this long before now.<br \/>\nHow are we clarifying expectations with new departments.<br \/>\nWill: I would encourage you guys to reach out to John to find out the details of the RFP<br \/>\nStephanie:  There are 3 different bids.<br \/>\nWill: That is the kicker, they may not take any of the RFPs but they still have to find that 77 number somewhere.  If IT doesn\u2019t get outsourced, that is a much shorter runway and much more abrupt.<br \/>\nChris:  I think it is our job to communicate with both leadership and staff<br \/>\nEmily: share the perception &#8211; this may not happen and we may just start firing people in two weeks.<br \/>\nWill:  I have a department of two.  I feel  we are not staff, we are a dollar amount.  We are interchangeable.  My wife who is faculty does not feel that way.<\/p>\n<p>VII.  Adjournment<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Staff Senate Meeting Minutes March 8, 2018 In Attendance: Chris Ballard, Dave Beard, Emily Berry, Eric Gumm, Kathy Redman, Scott Delony, Stephanie Woodlee, Tina Chisholm, Will Wyatt,* Ex Officio \u2013 Prentice Ashford, Cindy Gravitt, Grant Abston, Steve Rowlands, Jill Fortson, Aubree Browning, Shannon Kaczmarek, D&#8217;Angelo Sands, Debbie Stewart Call to Order Prayer Approval of Minutes [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8388,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_et_pb_use_builder":"","_et_pb_old_content":"","_et_gb_content_width":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[219106,623],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-453","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-219106","category-minutes"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.acu.edu\/staffsenate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/453","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.acu.edu\/staffsenate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.acu.edu\/staffsenate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.acu.edu\/staffsenate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8388"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.acu.edu\/staffsenate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=453"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.acu.edu\/staffsenate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/453\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":455,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.acu.edu\/staffsenate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/453\/revisions\/455"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.acu.edu\/staffsenate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=453"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.acu.edu\/staffsenate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=453"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.acu.edu\/staffsenate\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=453"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}