Stephanie Bell's Archive

Free Will and Unconscious

4 Commentsby   |  11.22.10  |  The Schools of Psychology (Part IV-B)

Our unconscious mind relies on previous experiences, on expectations, and on prior knowledge. We have control of the memories and facts that effect our unconscious choices. In the example given in class with the people’s pictures being flashed next to a figure that we had been taught in our history class to be either good or bad, we would then describe the person as being good or bad. Some people would argue that we have no control over how we relate the two picture to each other. I however, believe that we have control over how we view those people and the things that we associate with those people. We have been taught to view Hitler as an evil person who caused a mass genocide, so we would have associated negative qualities with Juice’s picture. But if we had chosen to associate Hitler as a good politician and successful leader, then we would have associated those qualities with Juice. So we do have free will over our unconscious because we chose how we will remember circumstances and people. We can remember the good qualities or the bad qualities and those are what will later play a role in how we judge similar situations.

Who Cares

3 Commentsby   |  10.25.10  |  The Schools of Psychology (Part IV)

I think that it is okay to test fears in children. The experiment with little Albert is a good model for how fears come about in any situation and we wouldn't necessarily criticize the other circumstances that are the same. Fears are all learned anyways and you can overcome a fear. I was able to overcome a lot of my fears as I got older because I realized that a lot of them were unreasonable. I was afraid of bugs, but I didn't have a reason to be afraid of them. I was afraid because I heard someone else scream when they saw a bug. I assumed that they were fearful for a reason, so I became scared. When other people scream it is like making a loud noise behind a child. We then learn to be afraid of the situation because of the things we learn to associate with it. I was always more fearful if I heard others scream then when I am alone. 

It’s in Us

1 Commentby   |  10.13.10  |  Announcements

I always thought religion was a personal choice and I still do. But I find it interesting that odds are that we will believe similar concepts as our family does. When we talked about genetics playing a role in religion it made me wonder how close my families' beliefs are to mine. I stray off a bit from what I was raised to believe, but if you look at my family a lot of us stray off from what we are originally taught and we all question what our parents tell us to believe. I didn't think about it a whole lot until this class but now I am curious as to what made them decide to start questioning religious teachings. 

In class this quote was mentioned: 
"When the life of the soul is connected in every detail by bodily organs and processes, how can it be detached from the body and survive it?" 

This quote made me laugh at first because I wondered if maybe all of those people who's bodies are still found after years of being buried where the people who didn't make it to heaven. But then I started seriously thinking about the question. How can we even prove what the soul is? It is a manmade concept so technically we can shape it into whatever we decide. But maybe (assuming it is all connect) the soul separates itself from the body after death like a chemical bonds. (For those non-Chemistry people) Chemical bonds help hold everything together, but certain procedures (maybe death when talking about the soul) can cause the chemical bond to break and thus you have two product chemicals. Maybe death causes the soul and body to separate and result in two products from one "body" (reactant).

How realistic is our perception?

2 Commentsby   |  10.04.10  |  Announcements

This lecture reminded me of a conversation my dad and I had prior to me leaving for college. How do we know what other people see is the same as what we see? On "FML" one time I saw a post about a dad who had taught his daughter the colors wrong because he thought it would be funny. After reading this I laughed but then thought about it. We only know what we are taught to be colors. We are taught blue is blue, green is green, and so on; but how do we know that the color we perceive to be blue or perceive to be green is actually the same as the color the teacher perceives to be blue or green. What if the people we believe are "colorblind" actually have it right and we are actually the ones who do not see colors properly? 

I also sometimes wonder if the events in our lives other people perceive to exist are different from the events we perceive to exist. Even when two people see the same event, they recall it differently, so what if this is how all of life is? Maybe we perceive what someone else says differently than how they perceive they said it. What if we only perceive that other people exist. We can not ever get inside someone else's head to be sure that they really exist. Our brain can perceive pain in a limb that no longer exists, so we can never really be sure that what we feel actually exists. What if when we touch other people it is only our brain thinking that there is another person there? 

“We were made for each other”

7 Commentsby   |  09.20.10  |  Renaissance/Premodern (Part II)

How far does free will go? I was talking to my roommate about this the night before we talked about it in class. We discussed how people often say that they are looking for The One. Did God make one person for each of us? If so then do we really have power over our life if God will make us choose this one person? Maybe God knows what choices we will make with our lives and based off of that he knows who we will ultimately chose and makes a person that will fit the choices that we make in our lives. My roomie talked about how when you say that God meant for you to be with a specific person that she thinks it is like saying that all of the events in your life happened in order for you to meet this one person. But is this really the case? What if the person who is made for you goes against God’s will (because I would assume that if I have free will that the other person would too)? Personally, I would not agree that all of the events in my life have led up to me meeting one particular person.

If our free will is limited then is it still free will? I feel like the answer to that would be no because we are not given full control of our own lives. And why would God make so many other people available to us if he had already chosen the one? Why would he not just create us to have some overwhelming feeling of finding the one when it happens. (Now I am not married and may not have found the person so I am not one hundred percent true that I would not know when I had found the one.) I feel like this is just another one of those small details that make our life what it is. If God is not concerned in the minor details of our lives but instead is interested in how we use our talents to help other people, then I feel like something like choosing a mate would not be on his top priorities. Unless perhaps, our mate is suppose to somehow influence the rest of our life and possibly change the course of where we are headed.

Acu and the cave allegory

3 Commentsby   |  09.06.10  |  Pre-Renaissance (Part I)

Last year I was the only person in a Bible study in my dorm who was
not Church of Christ. I realized that a lot of the freshman were quick
to jump on the bandwagon and were like people in the cave. My views
were still Christian but a little different and when I challenge their
beliefs their were quick to say I was wrong. I felt their views were
distorted because they were only looking at the situation from their
side and not trying to understand what someone else may think. Some of the girls in the Bible study were really offended and tried to say that I obviously was not Christian just because I questioned how they were saying you should treat people who do not believe in Christ. They claimed to believe that the best way to teach people about Christianity is to go build churches and take them to them. I was trying to argue that the best way is to live the way the Bible teaches us and then people will be more interested in what you try to tell them. I have been to countries where Christianity is not the main religion, and people think that their religion is best. If we try to go tell them that they are wrong in their beliefs and that our views are right, then they are going to think that we are trying to be disrespectful to them. This is like when someone challenges a person in the cave and they refuse to believe what they have not seen.
Stephanie Bell

Stephanie Bell's Comment Archive

  1. Stephanie Bell on Stop... Skinner Time
    11:13 pm, 10.13.10

    That video was pretty interesting. It makes me wonder if maybe we are conditioned to do everything that it is we do. And I would believe that the only reason we “read” is because we have been trained to respond a certain way to a given word.

  2. Stephanie Bell on Faith Based on Feelings
    11:07 pm, 10.13.10

    I really liked your post. I believe that maybe having the part of the brain that creates “God experiences” helps prove that there is a god. And as each of us searches for the answer (assuming that we chose to) our faith is becoming stronger.

  3. Stephanie Bell on I am not a Sadist.
    1:45 pm, 10.04.10

    And I laugh at myself when I get hurt because it turns a bad situation into a brighter one.

  4. Stephanie Bell on I am not a Sadist.
    1:45 pm, 10.04.10

    I totally laughed, and you heard me laughing. But it is not because I do not care about the guy’s injuries. It is because I have gotten injured like that before, and it comforts me to know that other people have had the same bad experiences that I have and that I am not alone.

  5. And honestly, how many people would choose to be with someone who is mentally or physically disabled over someone who is “healthy”? Even if someone has a great personality we may overlook their personality if they are not healthy. That is not to say we will not be friends with them, but how many people want to have kids with someone who is showing signs that they could have genes that would cause future offspring to be “unhealthy”. If we have an unhealthy kid hopefully we would still raise them to the best of our ability, but how many people want their kids to be unhealthy?

  6. Stephanie Bell on Percieved Reality
    1:36 pm, 10.04.10

    Wait. So if perception is reality what happens with the phantom limb? It is not actually there but you perceive it to be there. And what about when you perceive someone fits a certain category and it turns out to be wrong? If I always took my perceptions as reality, I would not be friends with my best friend. When she moved into the dorm I perceived that she was a stuck-up hick because she was wearing a camouflage hat and cowboy boots, and where I am from that meant stuck-up hick. It turns out she likes to ride horses and do stuff where her outfit would make sense. So I guess what I am saying is just because your brain tell you something is what it is does not make it what it is.

  7. I think that you still get to choose someone with a certain heart or personality that fits your liking. I think it is pretty safe to say that most people would not be in a relationship with someone that has a personality that they do not like or who hates the world. There are enough people in the world that you can find someone with different genes than you have and still have whatever personality you choose. The theory is not to say that there is no chance of having a child that is unhealthy, but that there is a better chance for having a baby with a healthier immune system. The couples that marry and then divorce may have found someone who better fits their liking (who may or may not still have different genes then them). You still have the freedom of choice but you are attracted to a certain group of people.

  8. I feel that we should discuss eugenics but that actually applying it may be walking a thin line between science and playing “God”. There is also a problem with eugenics taking out some genes that may help to control the population by taking out gene combinations that lead to certain diseases or cause someone to die young.

  9. I like the way you talked about how leaving the cave must be our personal decision. I find this to be very true because many people can be shown the truth over and over again and still choose not to recognize that their way of thinking was wrong.

  10. Stephanie Bell on Locke and Education
    4:04 pm, 09.20.10

    I believe that learning should not be forced. Teachers should try to find ways of “tricking” the children into learning. By this I mean that they should engage them in activities where they can observe some of the material firsthand and if we can accomplish this in a way where the children think they are playing then they will enjoy learning more. I was never forced to do anything school related that I did not want to, instead, my teachers found ways to get me interested in learning about something new. At my school, a lot of the lessons involved gaining hands on experience of the topic. Instead of the teacher standing up and explaining a math equation, the teacher would have us sing a song that explained the equation. The song usually was to some catchy tune, and we would memorize the song and without knowing it we had learned the material.