Below you’ll find both the “Wittenberg, 1934” case study and my own response to it, which was written during my final semester in the GST as part of the Theological Reflection in Practice class. Though the case brief does reflect to some degree the fact that it was written during a particularly stressful time of life (and for that reason I would not want to use it as a example of my best writing), I did receive an A on the paper.
I believe also that as imperfect as it is, it does exhibit some potential towards demonstrating outcomes 2abd, 3bce, 4abcd, 5abe, and 7abcd (and that if it had been developed to its fullest potential it would have demonstrated those outcomes to an even greater degree). The situation being what it was, though, as much as I would have liked to give this case more attention, I deemed what you’ll find below “good enough” in order to be able to move on with life, an indication, I believe, of outcomes 8cf and 9a.
Wittenberg, 1934 — Case
Zimmermann’s Choice: A Dilemma of Discernment in 1934 Nazi Germany
Add a Comment