Archive for September, 2009

Are animal torture videos free speech?

by   |  09.20.09  |  Censorship and Prior Restraint, First Amendment, Supreme Court, Violence

Are animal torture videos free speech? — chicagotribune.com. More »

Parents sue Walmart, Arizona over kids’ bath photos

by   |  09.18.09  |  Obscenity and Pornography

Parents sue Walmart, Arizona over kids’ bath photos | National | Chron.com – Houston Chronicle. More »

Do You Have the Right to Flip Off a Cop?

by   |  09.15.09  |  Censorship and Prior Restraint

Picture 2

From Comm Law alum Tanner Knauth: This fits with our discussion today of the Chaplinsky case and refers to Cohen v. California, which we’ll talk about Thursday. More »

American Indians look to high court

by   |  09.15.09  |  Copyright and Trademark, Current Events, Free Speech

WashingtonRedskins

A group of American Indians are going after the Washington Redskins — but they’re using trademark law to do it. More »

Online Critic Of Judge Fined

by   |  09.14.09  |  Censorship and Prior Restraint, Current Events

MediaPost Publications Online Critic Of Judge Fined 09/14/2009. More »

Schools Wrestle With Flag Policy in Classroom

by   |  09.14.09  |  Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause, First Amendment

Pledge of Confusion? Schools Wrestle With Flag Policy in Classroom – Local News | News Articles | National News | US News – FOXNews.com. More »

C-Span plans court special

by   |  09.04.09  |  Supreme Court

C-Span has posted interviews with several Supreme Court Justices about the effects of changes on the court in anticipation of a special that will run the week the court begins its session. This reminds me of this brief, which says Justice John Paul Stevens, the oldest member of the court is showing some signs of leaning toward retirement soon. More »

Court to re-hear arguments in Clinton movie case

by   |  09.03.09  |  Free Speech, political speech

The Supreme Court his hear arguments again on Thursday related to this case, Citizens United v. FEC. I believe the question is whether campaign finance reform is of such a compelling interest that free speech protections can be narrowed. More »