Pythagorus and Redemption

1 Commentby   |  09.06.13  |  Student Posts

Creation and the Fall are both valid positions for classifying Pythagorus. Pythagorus’ understanding of the nature of a perfect mathematical reality that transcends sensory experience is very much a Creation ideal. It represents a level of created perfection and a standard for which we can measure what is true and real. The harmonious workings of the body and nature are magnificent but an imbalance is the result of discord. However, as humans, our experiences and perceptions are limited and we cannot ever see this perfection. This represents the Fall’s ideal. It is in a sense, showing that we live in a separated state from that which is perfection. I would like to suggest, however, that Pythagorus best fits with the Redemption ideal. The empirical world that we live in exists independently from “the world of numbers”. But Pythagorus exerts that we can eventually come to know this other world through reason. When we choose to use rationality we see the flawlessness of this other world. It is recognizing the dualism that takes place between the mind and body, this world and the abstract world, that starts the Redemption argument. Much like Christianity and faith in Christ, there is no escaping the fact that something more Perfect must exist. While rationality might not be how the believer classifies the transcendent experience of coming to know Christ, it is through this other thought process– and an effort on our part to put behind what we can simply see and search for something more– that we are redeemed. The Law provided to the Israelites outlined a standard of perfection. Similarly, this is much like the laws of mathematics that govern Pythagorus’ thinking. Pythagorus encouraged periods of silence to exercise rational thought. He also believed in “imposing certain taboos and by hard physical and mental exercise” to reach a state of tranquility and harmony. The disciplines exerted to reach greater understanding is much like the disciplining the Christian must go through for growth. For Pythagorus this is made possible through rationality. For the Christian it is possible through the Holy Spirit. In both cases, the soul is needing to escape the fallen body. Classifying Pythagorus to one specific category is challenging. However, Redemption seems to best describe his philosophy.

1 Comment

  1. Levi Ritchie
    10:51 pm, 09.09.13

    As someone who once thought philosophy was useless and fake, Pythagoras must be the one who changed my mind the most. One of the most revealing things about his views is their practical application. There are no true shapes in the physical world, but a perfect triangle, circle, cube, etc. can be comprehended and studied. We can learn from them because they are meaningful in the present.

    I like associating this idea of present truth with redemption. It’s so often seen as something that will come, or, as many people believe, will happen after the rapture, tribulation, or death. In the same way that Pythagoras identified these non-physical yet absolutely true concepts in the real world, we can understand the Kingdom of God as something that’s not just “coming” but that we’re already able to shape and bring to earth as it is in heaven.

Add a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.