“Iran, Oman agree outline for 60-day Hormuz deal – Al Arabiya,” Iran International, 8-6-26.  (But I think it won’t be completed, nor imposed).  “The proposed agreement would last 60 days, aiming to resume maritime traffic, break the current stalemate and launch technical talks. It still requires approval from Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, the source said.  Under the plan, vessels entering the strait would use the shipping lane closest to Iran, while outbound vessels would use the lane closest to Oman. Regional parties could also take part in mine clearance and other necessary technical procedures, the report said.”

“Proposed Hormuz deal unworkable for shipping industry – Reuters,” Iran International, 8-6-26.  A proposed Iran-Oman deal giving Tehran control over ships entering the Persian Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz would be difficult to implement because of US sanctions and insurance restrictions.  …  Iran was seeking fees of 5% to 7% of cargo values, while Oman was discussing charges of about 3%. Washington wanted passage without fees, the report said.  The sources said payments could trigger US sanctions because Washington has designated Iran’s Persian Gulf Strait Authority.  A Lloyd’s Market Association clause also ends insurance coverage for vessels that pay Hormuz transit fees.”

NDTV repeats the story about the U.S. arsenal actually being low, which affects its strategy.  “’Thought It Had Been Fixed’: Trump Lashed Out At Hegseth Over Weapons Shortage,” NDTV, 8-6-26.

“Can Iran’s Diminished Diplomats Deliver a Hormuz Deal?,” WSJ, 8-6-26.