“U.K. Believes Iran Was Involved in Incident at Air Base, Burnham Says,” NYT, 9-30-26.  “The British prime minister, Andy Burnham, said there were “strong indications” Iran played a part in the events at R.A.F. Fairford on Sunday, without providing details why.” … “The authorities said on Tuesday that they had found no explosives in the vans, only an unspecified quantity of gasoline.”

“Prisoners beaten, kept in windowless cells at Isfahan prison,” Iran International, 9-30-26.

“Rubio orders visiting Iranian UN delegation to leave NYC ahead of schedule,” AP, 9-30-26.

“US Offers $15 Million Reward for Information on Three IRGC Officials,” Iranwire, 9-30-26.

“5 men arrested near a U.S.-run base bailed as UK police probe if there’s an Iran link,” NPR, 9-29-26.

Bounties are ugly.  And illegal under the Hague Convention, which the Jerusalem Post should have noted.  “Iran offers up to $40,000 reward to Middle East citizens who capture, kill US soldiers – report,” JPost, 9-29-26.

“US forces exit Iraq after two decades, leaving opening for Iran,” Reuters, 9-29-26.

“Netanyahu–Mohammed bin Zayed meeting: Representatives from Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Morocco attend,” I24, 9-29-26.

Masked men and three white vans seen in the middle of the night seen by a farmer heading for RAF Fairford, where the public can get very close to B-1s and B-52s due to the set-up of the base.  The men are British nationals, live in London, mid-20s.  Not identified publicly yet.  In fact, little has been revealed yet.  In July, the IRGC had threatened any base anywhere if involved in Iran attacks.  One last thing to mention—Iran has often world-wide hired local thugs to do its assassinations and bombings, men who are not the brightest of criminals.  Wearing a mask while driving a van near an important air base is not very smart.  “U.K. holds 5 British suspects after arrests near U.S. air base as Iran denies role,” NPR, AP, 9-28-26.

I’ll say.  “Release of 5 Men in U.K. Prompts New Questions Over Possible Terror Plot,” NYT, 9-28-26.  I’ve got no idea how any confessions could have been checked out this quickly, and the UK could hold them for 14 days.  And if there were no confessions, they shouldn’t have been released so quickly.  Keystone Cops?  And do you remember this blog’s recording of the below-story from 9-24?  “Britain warns Iran it will not tolerate hostile activity on UK soil,” Reuters, 9-24-26.  And you hold while you probe, you don’t give them a chance to flee.  BTW, what do their interrogations reveal about the plot?  “5 men arrested near a US-run air base are bailed as UK police probe whether there’s a link to Iran,” AP, 9-28-26.

“Saudi Arabia is reaping a massive oil windfall, making it perhaps the Iran war’s only winner. Tehran’s proxies actually ‘did Saudi a favor’,” Fortune, 9-28-26.

The most important news of the day.  “Middle East Oil Exports Rebound as Iran’s Chokehold on Hormuz Breaks Down,” WSJ, 9-28-26.  “The U.S. Navy and Gulf oil producers have become better at fending off or evading Iranian attacks, allowing more tankers to cross the strait. Middle Eastern crude exports rebounded this month to around their highest level since the war began in February, oil data trackers say. Shipments via Hormuz and bypass routes were delivering just under 80% of their prewar regional flows as of last week, according to tracker Kpler. So far this month, crude exports from major Middle Eastern producers including Saudi Arabia, Iraq, the U.A.E. and others—moving through Hormuz and alternative routes—have risen to almost 13 million barrels a day. That is the highest total since February, when the region exported nearly 19 million barrels a day, according to ship tracker Huax. … Iran, by contrast, has been unable to move crude through Hormuz since the U.S. reinstated its maritime blockade in July. The stores of oil that Iran had stockpiled beyond the blockade could run out by mid-October, Kpler estimates, choking off a vital source of revenue as the country’s economy buckles under the pressure of sanctions and the strain of war. The shift weakens Tehran’s ability to extract concessions by holding global energy supplies hostage, undercutting one of its most potent sources of leverage in talks to wind down the conflict. But it also creates a dangerous incentive. With its own oil income dwindling and its neighbors finding workarounds, Iran might see renewed attacks as its best remaining means of applying pressure, even at the risk of American retaliation. … After the U.S. and Israel launched the war in February, Iran’s attacks on the strait severely disrupted shipping and forced Gulf producers to look for workarounds. Saudi Arabia diverted crude across the desert to the Red Sea, while the United Arab Emirates used its pipeline to the port of Fujairah on the Gulf of Oman, but those didn’t fill the gap. Oil prices rose and with them the cost of gasoline and diesel for American consumers. Iran used that leverage to cut a deal with President Trump in June that promised upfront financial relief for reopening the waterway. That deal fell apart when Iran started attacking commercial ships in the strait. [Miscalculation by hardliners] … Meanwhile, the volume of Iranian crude already on vessels outside the blockade—which is still generating revenue for Tehran—has fallen to around 15 million barrels from 29 million barrels in early September. Kpler expects those barrels, most of which are destined for China, to be depleted by early to mid-October at the current pace. “Probably within the next two weeks…they are going to make their final deliveries of oil to China, and then they will have nothing,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday on Fox News.”

“Iran under scrutiny after plot foiled near UK base used by US military,” Fox News, 9-28-26.

A Remus 600, $3.5M.  “Iran Guards say seized US underwater drone in Hormuz,” Arab News, 9-27-26.

The new, heavy sanctions are having an effect.  “Waltz says Iran wanted sanctions relief up front in rejected deal; Tehran pushes back,” Politico, 9-27-26.

“Iran Is Pressed to Make Nuclear Concessions to Revive Peace Talks With U.S.,” WSJ, 9-27-26.  What I (and some others) have predicted is now true—Iran is no longer a theocracy, but a thugocracy, run by a mafia-like military.  “But Iran has given mediators little indication that it is ready to talk about its nuclear program.  Iranian leaders are confident that they can withstand a long-term U.S. blockade or a renewed bombing campaign from the Americans, said Middle East government officials who speak with Tehran regularly. The officials said Iranian power is now concentrated in the hands of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a paramilitary and economic force that has long taken a hard line against compromise with the West.”

“How Iran Changed War:  The Lessons of Tehran’s Use of Precise Mass,” Foreign Affairs, 9-25-26.  “But more than six months later, the Iranian regime not only remains intact; it is perhaps stronger than before. It immediately replaced lost officials and struck back at Washington and its regional partners. And it shuttered the Strait of Hormuz, driving up energy prices around the world and winning newfound political leverage—all to the great frustration of U.S. officials. There are several reasons why Iran performed surprisingly well. For one, the country had long planned for American and Israeli attacks, so it was prepared to reconstitute its government when top leaders were killed. It was also able to import enough goods to keep its economy from completely collapsing despite a U.S. naval blockade. But one of the most significant factors is that the Islamic Republic had built up a large arsenal of cheap yet accurate drones and missiles. These munitions made Iran’s counterattacks effective and allowed it to close the strait—and thus deter American escalation. In doing so, Iran has demonstrated something broader. The age of what I called precise mass—or high-volume, low-cost, precision-guided weapons—is well underway. It is no longer possible for the U.S. military, or any military, to win a full-blown war simply by using small numbers of exquisite weapons to dazzle opponents. Weaker countries can match stronger ones through offensive barrages. Offense is currently cheaper than defense: the price of effective interceptors has yet to fall to the level of attack drones and missiles, which means defending against precise mass is extremely costly. After all, militaries cannot endlessly block salvos of $35,000 Shahed-136 attack drones with $4 million Patriot missiles.”  Two things—this is not an impossible situation for the allies but we should note they did not want to put armies on the ground.  Second, the article doesn’t point out that the Supreme Leader model has been shattered, and we don’t even know if the Leader of the country is alive.

A reminder of the enabling.  “GOP senators dismayed by Trump embrace of Xi after China helped Iran target US troops,” The Hill, 9-25-26.

Important news, and consistent with those who say that the Regime will never give up seeking a nuclear weapon (despite the false claims the former Leader forbid it via fatwa—that document was never produced).  See “Iran rules out nuclear concessions even if US accepts Hormuz proposal,” Iran International, 9-25-26.

The air shutdown is taking effect.  “Iran threatens regional air travel as US sanctions cut its flight links,” Iran Internation,” 9-25-26.  More sweeping is this next important story.  “A U.S. Arm-Twisting Campaign Is Cutting Iran Off From the Rest of the World,” WSJ, 9-25-26.  The U.S. is finally, since 1979, getting serious about sanctions.  Air Mahan closed, same with major banks, good news.

Which also gives the U.S. more time to produce munitions.  “Trump Rejects Iran Ceasefire, Expects Renewed Bombing After Midterms,” WSJ, 9-25-26.

“Britain warns Iran it will not tolerate hostile activity on UK soil,” Reuters, 9-24-26.

“Iran lawmaker calls talks with Trump a ‘code word’ for attack,” Iran International, 9-24-26.

“We aren’t trying to kill Trump, Iran’s president insists to reporters at New York hotel,” CNN, 9-24-26.  Frequent readers of this blog know that I am skeptical of the claims the Leader is healthy or even alive.  This CNN article has the president saying the following.  “In the briefing, Pezeshkian also described recent meetings he had held with Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei, who has not been seen in public since the outset of the war, saying that the leader was “quite healthy.” There has been mounting speculation in recent months over Khamenei’s health, after he was understood to have sustained serious injuries in the US-Israeli attack that killed his father and predecessor Ali Khamenei at the beginning of the conflict in February. Speaking about Khamenei’s condition, Pezeshkian said, “I did not see any major challenges with his health or physical appearance,” adding that their most recent in-person meeting had taken place around one month ago and lasted around seven hours. Pezeshkian said the pair had sat on pillows on the ground and stood up to walk around during the meeting. US intelligence assesses that despite his injuries Khamenei is still playing a critical role in shaping war strategy alongside senior Iranian officials, multiple sources familiar with the intelligence said in May.”  But no photos, no handwriting, no videos.  Still skeptical.

“Khamenei adviser says Iran may take war to Indian Ocean if Israel or US strikes again,” AFP, 9-24-26.

“Iran Has a Secret Weapon in Its War With America: Help From China,” WSJ, 9-23-26.  “Iranian customs data show Chinese entities have made thousands of shipments of components used in drones and missiles.”   This blog has recorded this problem dozens of times.  In the blog I use the term “enablng.”

Really rich.  “Iran president: We have been “victims of terrorism,” Axios, 9-23-26.  But by everyone else’s definition, Iran fails.

“Iran’s president warns Trump it will not ‘bend at the knee’,” Politico, 9-23-26.

“Pezeshkian squeezed at home over meeting Trump in New York,” Iran International, 9-23-26.

Remember, China can get all the (cheap) oil they need elsewhere.  “Trump asked Xi to stop supporting Iran,” Axios, 9-23-26.

See?  The Regime is behind it.  “Iranian advisers helped Houthis seize Yemen’s Red Sea coast in less than 48 hours, sources tell AP,” AP, 9-23-26.

“Iran threatens to paralyse airports in neighbouring countries if they stop Iranian flights,” Reuters, 9-23-26.

I’ve been waiting for this type of article.  When the U.S. brought the economic sanctions hammer down on Iran two weeks ago, Iran decided to find a pressure point in an attempt to relieve the pressure.  That involved Iran telling its proxie group to attack the Kingdom.  “Houthis’ escalating attacks on Saudi Arabia give Iran leverage in the Middle East,” ABC, 9-21-26.

“US targets Iranian airlines, Tehran threatens wider war,” Iran International, 9-21-26.

“Iran’s President Gets Rare Opportunity to Make His Case to the World,” WSJ, 9-21-26.

“Iranian FM reportedly met Witkoff at sidelines of UNGA to discuss Hormuz reopening | LIVE BLOG,” I24, 9-21-26.