Sydney Smith 
Denysha Taylor Creation and the Fall are both valid positions for classifying Pythagorus. Pythagorus’ understanding of the nature of a perfect mathematical reality that transcends sensory experience is very much a Creation ideal. It represents a level of created perfection and a standard for which we can measure what is true and real. The harmonious workings of the body and nature are magnificent but an imbalance is the result of discord. However, as humans, our experiences and perceptions are limited and we cannot ever see this perfection. This represents the Fall’s ideal. It is in a sense, showing that we live in a separated state from that which is perfection.
I would like to suggest, however, that Pythagorus best fits with the Redemption ideal. The empirical world that we live in exists independently from “the world of numbers”. But Pythagorus exerts that we can eventually come to know this other world through reason. When we choose to use rationality we see the flawlessness of this other world. It is recognizing the dualism that takes place between the mind and body, this world and the abstract world, that starts the Redemption argument.
Much like Christianity and faith in Christ, there is no escaping the fact that something more Perfect must exist. While rationality might not be how the believer classifies the transcendent experience of coming to know Christ, it is through this other thought process– and an effort on our part to put behind what we can simply see and search for something more– that we are redeemed. The Law provided to the Israelites outlined a standard of perfection. Similarly, this is much like the laws of mathematics that govern Pythagorus’ thinking.
Pythagorus encouraged periods of silence to exercise rational thought. He also believed in “imposing certain taboos and by hard physical and mental exercise” to reach a state of tranquility and harmony. The disciplines exerted to reach greater understanding is much like the disciplining the Christian must go through for growth. For Pythagorus this is made possible through rationality. For the Christian it is possible through the Holy Spirit. In both cases, the soul is needing to escape the fallen body.
Classifying Pythagorus to one specific category is challenging. However, Redemption seems to best describe his philosophy.
D.J. Acevedo
8:29 pm, 09.09.13
This was a great post! I don’t know where in the world I would have put Pythagorus, which is why I didn’t write about him, but your post helped me to understand him a bit better. I like what you pointed out:
“However, as humans, our experiences and perceptions are limited and we cannot ever see this perfection. This represents the Fall’s ideal. It is in a sense, showing that we live in a separated state from that which is perfection.”
You pointed out a big truth; though we may never truly know perfection here, we will in heaven, what a beautiful reminder.
Nicole Nelson
10:00 pm, 09.09.13
Jessica,
I loved the line where you said “Much like Christianity and faith in Christ, there is no escaping the fact that something more Perfect must exist.” I completely agree. I also love the connection that you make the comment about how faith is not a rational process. Because it’s so true, that is why it’s so hard to argue most of the time to non-believers because there are somethings that just do not fit into a the mold of what is rationally acceptable. I also like how you point out that it is up to us as humans to get the redemption process rolling, Christ doesn’t owe us anything so if we want to achieve this redemption and restoration we need to work for it. Great post!