Schopenhauer’s pessimism

3 Commentsby   |  10.04.13  |  Second Blog Post

Schopenhauer was a very intelligent man and philosopher, however, his view of life is reflective of the fall. He had a very pessimistic view of how life is lived by humans, and this idea set the tone for his beliefs and discoveries. He was a German philosopher who was greatly influenced by Kant, which not surprisingly guided his ways of thinking in some areas. He believed that humans were motivated by only their own basic desires and he believed that this idea directed all of mankind. We all have a will to survive which causes an unending cycle of needs and need satisfaction. Most human behavior, because of this idea, he considered irrational. We have pain caused by an unsatisfied need and that causes us to act to satisfy that need. Furthermore, he thought that human desire was futile, illogical, directionless, and, by extension, so was all human action in the world. To address this idea, he wrote that “man can indeed do what he wants, but he cannot will what he wants.”

There are many more examples of the fall in Schopenhauer’s ways of thinking, but I want to specifically focus on this idea of the will to survive. The way he unravel’s this thought reflects the conclusion that human’s have needs and without fulfillment of those needs, there is a sense of pain that we endure. Even further, when we satisfy those needs it is only a momentary satisfaction which lasts only until another need presents itself. He continued to say that even when all the needs that we have are satisfied, there is not joy or freedom, but simply boredom. These main ideas significantly reflect some aspects the Christian idea of the fall represents. The fall is a failure of perfection. It went from a place of perfect creation, where there are no needs, no pains, and all fulfillment was in the creator, to this place described by Schopenhauer. It is evident: human’s have needs and there is a lot of pain in this world. People are seeking for fulfillment in every area they can because they want to satisfy their feelings of need, pain, and loss. These things are a direct reflection of the fall, and even though this wasn’t believed by Schopenhauer, there is power in the following idea of the resurrection which furthermore leads to restoration and a place of freedom and fulfillment. Schopenhauer seemingly believed that there was no true fulfillment and that there was only temporary satisfaction because need and pain is endless throughout life. That is the beauty of the resurrection of Jesus. This idea of the fall is real and prevalent in the lives of human’s, Schopenhauer understood that completely, but there is power in the resurrection that free’s us from the detriment produced by the fall of man and that leads to fulfillment, freedom, and true satisfaction.

3 Comments

  1. Jacey Ferrara
    5:59 pm, 10.07.13

    Zach,

    I definitely see how Schopenhauer teaches us about the fall. His ideas definitely seem pessimistic and all geared at discussing the flaws of humans. It seems like he really doesn’t hold any hope for humans, and honestly if I thought the way he did, I think I would feel depressed. I really like that you ended your blog post with mentioning the resurrection of Jesus and the power that holds! We are fallen, but we don’t have to stay that way by the grace and mercy of God.

  2. Jennifer Valenzuela
    8:12 pm, 10.07.13

    Great perspective Zach! I totally agree with you in that sometimes us humans have a hard time being fully satisfied. I also liked what you said about the fall being a failure of perfection. Because of the fall, we live in an imperfect world where, even as Christians, we sometimes do not satisfy ourselves in The Lord.

  3. Denysha Taylor
    10:14 pm, 10.07.13

    I’ll be honest; I’m not a big fan of Schopenhauer. The idea that every human’s life is need/satisfaction-driven makes me feel as though human beings have no real control over their lives. I do believe that needs/pain are powerful and can be overwhelming, but that doesn’t mean they can’t be useful as well. What about all the various situations were human beings are forced to do something they would rather not? Like run into a burning for a random stranger? That’s internal battle were motivation is concerned. I agree that Schopenhauer should be associated with the Fall. Good choice. I think that Schopenhauer really underestimated our potential as humans and the power of God.

Add a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.