Blog #6: Third Force Psychology
Third Force Psychology encourages individualism and creativity. This psychology movement can be easily seen in North American media. From television shows featuring a wide range of programs from showcasing musical or dancing abilities to pregnant and drug addicted adolescents, to entertainment sensations such as Justin Bieber and Carrie Underwood. Another prominent entertainment figure is Rihanna. In her songs and music videos Rihanna puts passion and personality into each one, leaving the newest addition to her legacy more astounding than the last. In her song “S&M,” the artist claims to be talking about her relationship with the paparazzi, yet popular culture took an entirely different view on the subject matter. In her music video, “We Found Love” ft. Calvin Harris,” Rihanna shows off the many aspects of her personality making the video as unique as her. The audience sees a romantic couple, yet the constant costume and wardrobe changes, along with the borderline explicit behavior show that Rihanna is not ashamed or embarrassed about romantic behavior.
I believe it is models like this that have lead to the desensitization of America’s youth. Growing up, media was much more censored than it is today; material that was once on during the dark hours of evening is now readily available for children during the dinner hours. Not to mention the ease at which production companies prey on the general population. In the wake of “reality T.V.” it seems that any yahoo with a knack for getting into trouble or making people laugh can get an hour segment on a network. Examples such as “Teen Mom,” “Jersey Shore,” “The Bachelor,” and “Big Brother” quickly come to mind. Today’s reality television has replaced the cartoons and scripted family values shows (such as “Rugrats” and “Full House”) that used to predominate television. The lower standard of television has lead to America’s youth believing that it is normal or okay to engage and delinquent behavior and be satisfied with a life that is drastically altered by consequences they do not fully comprehend.
Stephanie Heron on Blog #6
5:01 pm, 04.24.13
I like that you brought religion into your discussion. I agree that God has given us free will and it is up to us to choose to follow Him or not. Third Force Psychology focuses on the aspects of human behavior that are influenced by uncontrollable factors (other’s actions that affect one’s own life) and how we react to them.
Stephanie Heron on Third Force Psychology
4:55 pm, 04.24.13
I agree that America is an example of Third Force Psychology and that parents today tend to encourage their child’s creativity and talents over shoving them into a cookie-cutter lifestyle. I also think Third Force Psychology is part of America’s innovative economic system because we have generations growing up with the encouragement to think outside the box. It’s the innovative thinking that has brought society to it’s current progressive state.
Stephanie Heron on
12:47 pm, 04.14.13
I agree that many of today’s actions and thoughts are attributed to subconscious tendencies. But I also believe that psychoanalytic thinking is starting to be used as a cop-out answer for individuals looking for an easy explanation to their behavior, regardless if it is viewed negatively or positively by others.
Stephanie Heron on Blog Post 5
12:42 pm, 04.14.13
I agree that projection alters how we view the actions of others and that stereotyping can be subconsciously promoted. But what about those who are aware of their snap judgments and actively seek to limit them. Would they be using psychoanalytic thinking on themselves to alter their view or are they trying to avoid psychoanalytic thinking all together?
Stephanie Heron on Blog 4: Psychoanalytic theory
4:15 pm, 04.02.13
I believe this a good example of the external factors that motivate behavior. Behaviorism argues the actions committed on a daily basis are rooted in conditioning. Yet there is more than that; when emotions get involved the conditioning lines get blurry. Here Kronk is conditioned to Yzma’s beck and call, yet being employed by the emperor has created a relationship between Kuzco (the emperor) and Kronk which causes the debate between the id, ego and super ego. I believe behaviorism has some valid arguments about behavior, however there are simply too many active factors in our lives for there to be so simple and explanation.
Stephanie Heron on Behaviorism
4:04 pm, 04.02.13
Along with the advancement of technology and the “improvement” of our society, we have also become dependent on technology. Cars are now the means of transportation, allowing us to travel greater distances faster. Phones have allowed us to communicate more effectively, as you have pointed out. However we have also become conditioned to our phone; we have different sound/tone options for the different features of the iPhone (text, email, phone call, update, etc.) and personally, I know by which tones if I need to respond to my phone quickly or not.
I agree that it is a depressing post. But then again, so is our new dependance on technology.
Stephanie Heron on Evolution of Faith
7:27 pm, 03.05.13
The statement “faith must adapt in order to survive” seems to be a sticky situation. The devout Christian would claim that the book of Genesis is how the world was created, end of story. And the atheist would claim the Big Bang Theory to be the truth. In high school my religion professor explained evolution to the class in a way that has stuck with me; I agree with it, yet at the same time I wonder if I am questioning my faith by going against what the Bible says. She told us that both theories could be true. God created the world in seven days, yet who is to say that the billions of years that it took organisms to evolve and flourish isn’t seven days according to God’s watch. We have all seen those trippy sci-fi movies that have the worm hole where time gets distorted, my professor was suggesting that clock we use to measure time and years doesn’t match the one God uses. It really made me think.
Stephanie Heron on True Altruism
7:18 pm, 03.05.13
I agree the idea of “you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours” will further the altruistic mentality of a group. However I disagree with the idea that the man who sacrifices his life for the group will not pass down his genes. Yes, if he has not already produced off spring then the dead man will not suddenly produce children. However, “survival of the fittest” will suggest that he was too weak, or too flawed, to produce any off spring of value to the group. Yet the hero he died as can serve as an example for future warriors, who have the genetic material of the stronger genes, to aspire to be like enabling the group a better chance of survival.
Stephanie Heron on Blog #1 - The Good Life
4:19 pm, 01.20.13
Josh,
I agree that happiness is the simple answer to the “good life” question because happiness is a subjective term. What constitutes as happiness for one individual will most likely not mean happiness for their neighbor. Looking around the community we live in, there are various examples of people attempting to reach a state of happiness in their live. Regardless of academic, social, religious, athletic or romantic happiness, individuals are continuously striving to be happy in all areas of their life deemed important to them.
Stephanie
Stephanie Heron on Blog One: The Good Life
4:13 pm, 01.20.13
I agree that you only get what you earn in today’s world. And I admire the desire, passion and dedication individuals show in their journey toward success. But is it still the good life if an individual does not have a sense of direction? If, for example, at the end of her college career, a soon to be graduate no longer has a direction to head in, should she just chose a path and strive to succeed? But then if she realizes this path no longer makes her happy does she alter courses? Or does that qualify as quitting and giving up to easily? Or should she just take a time of uncertainty to explore before deciding on a path to fully dedicate herself?